Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24699882›Full record

ArticleEndocrine2015

Identification and validation co-differentially expressed genes with NAFLD and insulin resistance.

Xiao-Chen Wang, Xiao-Rong Zhan, Xin-Yu Li, Jun-Jie Yu, Xiao-Min Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiao-Chen WangDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliation Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, 150001, Heilongjiang, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Rong Zhan
Xin-Yu Li
Jun-Jie Yu
Xiao-Min Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin resistance is a major feature and pathogenic factor of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Theoretically, genetic variation in candidate genes related to insulin resistance may contribute to the pathogenesis of NAFLD. The purpose of this study was to identify potentially pathogenic genes involved in NAFLD and insulin resistance that have not yet been discovered. This study yielded five important discoveries. 1. A total of 21 co-differentially expressed genes in both the NAFLD and insulin-resistance groups were identified from the pool containing thousands of genes via the significance analysis of microarrays method. 2. MAP kinase-interacting serine/threonine kinase 2 (Mknk2) was the unique gene to be identified that is involved in the insulin signaling pathway and Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase signaling pathway according to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes database. 3. Mknk2 mRNA and protein expression were dose-dependently up-regulated by palmitic acid (PA) in mouse primary hepatocytes. 4. Western blotting analysis and quantitative real-time PCR confirmed that Mknk2 affected the expression of acetyl-CoA carboxylases-1 and fatty acid synthase. 5. The inhibition of Mknk2 alleviated PA-induced insulin resistance, whereas the overexpression of Mknk2 resulted in the aggravation of insulin resistance in PA-treated hepatocytes. Therefore, we predict that MKNK2 may be a key protein related to NAFLD and insulin resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression RegulationGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestHepatocytesInsulin ResistanceMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePlasmidsPrimary Cell CultureProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesGlucoseMknk2 protein, mouseProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.