Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24699726›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Screening primary-care patients forgoing health care for economic reasons.

Patrick Bodenmann, Bernard Favrat, Hans Wolff, Idris Guessous, Francesco Panese, Lilli Herzig, Thomas Bischoff, Alejandra Casillas, Thomas Golano, Paul Vaucher

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Social Inequalities in Use of Preventive Dental and Medical Services among Adults in European Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick BodenmannVulnerable Population Unit, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bernard FavratDepartment of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hans WolffDepartment of Community Medicine, Primary Care, and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Idris GuessousDepartment of Community Medicine, Primary Care, and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital Geneva and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), University Hospital Center and Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Francesco PaneseInstitute of the History of Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lilli HerzigInstitute of General Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas BischoffInstitute of General Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Alejandra CasillasVulnerable Population Unit, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas GolanoInstitute of General Medicine, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Paul VaucherInstitute of Legal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGrowing social inequities have made it important for general practitioners to verify if patients can afford treatment and procedures. Incorporating social conditions into clinical decision-making allows general practitioners to address mismatches between patients' health-care needs and financial resources.

objectivesIdentify a screening question to, indirectly, rule out patients' social risk of forgoing health care for economic reasons, and estimate prevalence of forgoing health care and the influence of physicians' attitudes toward deprivation.

designMulticenter cross-sectional survey.

participantsForty-seven general practitioners working in the French-speaking part of Switzerland enrolled a random sample of patients attending their private practices. MAIN MEASURES: Patients who had forgone health care were defined as those reporting a household member (including themselves) having forgone treatment for economic reasons during the previous 12 months, through a self-administered questionnaire. Patients were also asked about education and income levels, self-perceived social position, and deprivation levels. KEY

resultsOverall, 2,026 patients were included in the analysis; 10.7% (CI95% 9.4-12.1) reported a member of their household to have forgone health care during the 12 previous months. The question "Did you have difficulties paying your household bills during the last 12 months" performed better in identifying patients at risk of forgoing health care than a combination of four objective measures of socio-economic status (gender, age, education level, and income) (R(2) = 0.184 vs. 0.083). This question effectively ruled out that patients had forgone health care, with a negative predictive value of 96%. Furthermore, for physicians who felt powerless in the face of deprivation, we observed an increase in the odds of patients forgoing health care of 1.5 times.

conclusionGeneral practitioners should systematically evaluate the socio-economic status of their patients. Asking patients whether they experience any difficulties in paying their bills is an effective means of identifying patients who might forgo health care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24699726
PMCPMC3974836
OpenAlexW2070237839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.