Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24699519›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

The mechanism of gene targeting in human somatic cells.

Yinan Kan, Brian Ruis, Sherry Lin, Eric A Hendrickson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Real-time observation of DNA target interrogation and product release by the RNA-guided endonuclease CRISPR Cpf1 (Cas12a).Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Precision genome editing using synthesis-dependent repair of Cas9-induced DNA breaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Modeling of Autism Using Organoid Technology.Molecular neurobiology · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yinan KanDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Brian RuisDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Sherry LinDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Eric A HendricksonDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, and Biophysics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
The mechanism of Cas9/CRISPR-initiated genome modification in human somatic cellsR01GM088351 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2010 to 2018
$2.3M
Ku regulates non-homologous end joining pathways in human somatic cellsR01CA154461 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI HENDRICKSON, ERIC A · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA154461NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154461NIGMS NIH HHS GM088351NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene targeting in human somatic cells is of importance because it can be used to either delineate the loss-of-function phenotype of a gene or correct a mutated gene back to wild-type. Both of these outcomes require a form of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair known as homologous recombination (HR). The mechanism of HR leading to gene targeting, however, is not well understood in human cells. Here, we demonstrate that a two-end, ends-out HR intermediate is valid for human gene targeting. Furthermore, the resolution step of this intermediate occurs via the classic DSB repair model of HR while synthesis-dependent strand annealing and Holliday Junction dissolution are, at best, minor pathways. Moreover, and in contrast to other systems, the positions of Holliday Junction resolution are evenly distributed along the homology arms of the targeting vector. Most unexpectedly, we demonstrate that when a meganuclease is used to introduce a chromosomal DSB to augment gene targeting, the mechanism of gene targeting is inverted to an ends-in process. Finally, we demonstrate that the anti-recombination activity of mismatch repair is a significant impediment to gene targeting. These observations significantly advance our understanding of HR and gene targeting in human cells.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA, CruciformDNA RepairGene TargetingGenetic VectorsHCT116 CellsHumansRecombination, GeneticDNADNA, Cruciform

Identifiers

PMID24699519
PMCPMC3974634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.