Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24699280›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Sucralose induces biochemical responses in Daphnia magna.

Ann-Kristin Eriksson Wiklund, Margaretha Adolfsson-Erici, Birgitta Liewenborg, Elena Gorokhova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nonnutritive Sweeteners in Breast Milk.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ann-Kristin Eriksson WiklundDepartment of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Margaretha Adolfsson-EriciDepartment of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Birgitta LiewenborgDepartment of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Elena GorokhovaDepartment of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intense artificial sweetener sucralose has no bioconcentration properties, and no adverse acute toxic effects have been observed in standard ecotoxicity tests, suggesting negligible environmental risk. However, significant feeding and behavioural alterations have been reported in non-standard tests using aquatic crustaceans, indicating possible sublethal effects. We hypothesized that these effects are related to alterations in acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and oxidative status in the exposed animals and investigated changes in AChE and oxidative biomarkers (oxygen radical absorbing capacity, ORAC, and lipid peroxidation, TBARS) in the crustacean Daphnia magna exposed to sucralose (0.0001-5 mg L(-1)). The sucralose concentration was a significant positive predictor for ORAC, TBARS and AChE in the daphnids. Moreover, the AChE response was linked to both oxidative biomarkers, with positive and negative relationships for TBARS and ORAC, respectively. These joint responses support our hypothesis and suggest that exposure to sucralose may induce neurological and oxidative mechanisms with potentially important consequences for animal behaviour and physiology.

Indexed as

AcetylcholinesteraseAnimalsBiomarkersDaphniaLipid PeroxidationOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesSucroseSweetening AgentsThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesAcetylcholinesteraseBiomarkersReactive Oxygen SpeciesSucroseSweetening AgentsThiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substancestrichlorosucrose

Identifiers

PMID24699280
PMCPMC3974716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.