Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24697498›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2014

Drug effects on multiple and concurrent schedules of ethanol- and food-maintained behaviour: context-dependent selectivity.

B C Ginsburg, R J Lamb

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B C GinsburgDepartments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
R J Lamb
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · US

Funding

Rat ethanol self-administration: respondent instrumental interactionsR01AA012337 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LAMB, RICHARD J · 2001 to 2016
$3.4M
Reinstatement of drug-maintained behavior suppressed by extinction or an availablR01AA016987 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI GINSBURG, BRETT C · 2008 to 2011
$790k
Models for examining selective effects of pharmacotherapy on reinforced behaviorsR03AA015993 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI GINSBURG, BRETT C · 2007 to 2008
$146k
NIAAA NIH HHS AA015993NIAAA NIH HHS AA016987NIAAA NIH HHS AA12337NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA012337NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA016987NIAAA NIH HHS R03 AA015993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDrugs that more potently or effectively reduce ethanol-maintained behaviour versus an alternative are considered selective and are considered promising pharmacotherapies for alcoholism. Such results are often obtained using separate groups or multiple schedules where ethanol and the alternative are available alone or sequentially. Recently, we observed that when ethanol and food were available sequentially under a multiple schedule, fluvoxamine and varenicline were selective; yet this selectivity disappeared when ethanol and food were concurrently available. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We examined the generality of these findings by comparing doses of several drugs required to decrease ethanol- and food-maintained responding under a multiple schedule and under a concurrent schedule. Effects were determined for chlordiazepoxide, 2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodoamphetamine (DOI), meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP), morphine, naltrexone and d-amphetamine. KEY

resultsUnder the multiple schedule, ED50 values for decreases in ethanol-maintained responding were significantly different and lower than ED50 s for decreases in food-maintained responding (demonstrating selectivity) for each drug except for chlordiazepoxide (which was equipotent) and naltrexone (which did not affect responding). However, this selectivity vanished or even inverted under the concurrent schedule, such that ED50 values for decreasing ethanol- and food-maintained responding were not different (or, following DOI, the ED50 for food-maintained responding was lower than for ethanol-maintained responding). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results are consistent with those seen following fluvoxamine and varenicline administration, and suggest that selectivity is assay-dependent. These results indicate the need for careful interpretation of selective drug effects, especially when obtained in situations where ethanol or the alternative is the only programmed reinforcement available.

Indexed as

FoodAlcoholismAmphetaminesAnimalsChlordiazepoxideDextroamphetamineDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleEatingEthanolMaleMorphinansNaltrexonePiperazinesRatsRats, Inbred Lew1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine4-iodo-2,5-dimethoxyphenylisopropylamineAmphetaminesChlordiazepoxideDextroamphetamineEthanolMorphinansNaltrexonePiperazines5-HTalcoholbenzodiazepinechoiceoperantopioidpharmacotherapyrat

Identifiers

PMID24697498
PMCPMC4105936
OpenAlexW1541220836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.