Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24697355›Full record

ReviewUpsala journal of medical sciences2014

Antibiotic resistance in wild birds.

Jonas Bonnedahl, Josef D Järhult

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High abundance ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Veterinary sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Frequency and characterization of β-lactam-resistant Escherichia coli from wild birds from Marmara Region in Turkey.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  12. Genomic Evidence of Multidrug-ResistantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonas BonnedahlDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Kalmar County Hospital, Sweden and Zoonotic Ecology and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University , Kalmar , Sweden.
Josef D Järhult

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wild birds have been postulated as sentinels, reservoirs, and potential spreaders of antibiotic resistance. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria have been isolated from a multitude of wild bird species. Several studies strongly indicate transmission of resistant bacteria from human rest products to wild birds. There is evidence suggesting that wild birds can spread resistant bacteria through migration and that resistant bacteria can be transmitted from birds to humans and vice versa. Through further studies of the spatial and temporal distribution of resistant bacteria in wild birds, we can better assess their role and thereby help to mitigate the increasing global problem of antibiotic resistance.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBirdsDrug Resistance, MicrobialAnimalsAntibiotic resistant bacteriaavianbird migrationenvironmentESBLhuman–animal interfacetransmission

Identifiers

PMID24697355
PMCPMC4034547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.