Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24696461›Full record

ArticleGenome research2014

Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins.

Sojung Kim, Daesik Kim, Seung Woo Cho, Jungeun Kim, Jin-Soo Kim

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,042 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,042citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,042 citing papers in PubMed, 1,853 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delivery of Targeting Constructs into Zygotes Using Electroporation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Electroporation for High-Efficiency Delivery of CRISPR to Hematopoietic Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chemically modified CRISPR enzymes for multi-organ genome editingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

982 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sojung KimDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, South Korea; Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-747, South Korea.
Daesik KimDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, South Korea; Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-747, South Korea.
Seung Woo ChoDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, South Korea; Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-747, South Korea.
Jungeun KimDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, South Korea; Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-747, South Korea.
Jin-Soo KimDepartment of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-747, South Korea; Center for Genome Engineering, Institute for Basic Science, Seoul 151-747, South Korea.
Seoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RNA-guided engineered nucleases (RGENs) derived from the prokaryotic adaptive immune system known as CRISPR (clustered, regularly interspaced, short palindromic repeat)/Cas (CRISPR-associated) enable genome editing in human cell lines, animals, and plants, but are limited by off-target effects and unwanted integration of DNA segments derived from plasmids encoding Cas9 and guide RNA at both on-target and off-target sites in the genome. Here, we deliver purified recombinant Cas9 protein and guide RNA into cultured human cells including hard-to-transfect fibroblasts and pluripotent stem cells. RGEN ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) induce site-specific mutations at frequencies of up to 79%, while reducing off-target mutations associated with plasmid transfection at off-target sites that differ by one or two nucleotides from on-target sites. RGEN RNPs cleave chromosomal DNA almost immediately after delivery and are degraded rapidly in cells, reducing off-target effects. Furthermore, RNP delivery is less stressful to human embryonic stem cells, producing at least twofold more colonies than does plasmid transfection.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, HumanRNA EditingCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedFibroblastsHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedPluripotent Stem CellsPoint MutationRibonucleoproteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas SystemsRibonucleoproteinsRNA, Guide, CRISPR-Cas Systems

Identifiers

PMID24696461
PMCPMC4032847
OpenAlexW2116534141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.