Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24696433›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology reviews2014

CD4+ T Cells: guardians of the phagosome.

Noah J Tubo, Marc K Jenkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cytotoxic CD4Parasite immunology · 2026
    Article
  3. CD4Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PLGA nanoparticles as an efficient carrier inFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Nutrients · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The dynamics and longevity of circulating CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of CD4Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CD4Nature immunology · 2023
    Review
  20. T helper 1 effector memory CD4Cell reports · 2023
    Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noah J TuboCenter for Immunology, Department of Microbiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Marc K Jenkins
University of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
The role of the TCR in effector CD4 T cell differentiationF32AI107995 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI TUBO, NOAH J · 2013 to 2014
$64k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI107995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD4(+) T cells are key cells of the adaptive immune system that use T cell antigen receptors to recognize peptides that are generated in endosomes or phagosomes and displayed on the host cell surface bound to major histocompatibility complex molecules. These T cells participate in immune responses that protect hosts from microbes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Cryptococcus neoformans, Leishmania major, and Salmonella enterica, which have evolved to live in the phagosomes of macrophages and dendritic cells. Here, we review studies indicating that CD4(+) T cells control phagosomal infections asymptomatically in most individuals by secreting cytokines that activate the microbicidal activities of infected phagocytes but in a way that inhibits the pathogen but does not eliminate it. Indeed, we make the case that localized, controlled, persistent infection is necessary to maintain large numbers of CD4(+) effector T cells in a state of activation needed to eradicate systemic and more pathogenic forms of the infection. Finally, we posit that current vaccines for phagosomal infections fail because they do not produce this "periodic reminder" form of CD4(+) T cell-mediated immune control.

Indexed as

CD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCryptococcus neoformansHumansLeishmania majorMacrophagesMycobacterium tuberculosisPhagosomesSalmonella entericaVaccinesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID24696433
PMCPMC3993097
OpenAlexW2109768640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.