Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24696400›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

What the X has to do with it: differences in regulatory variability between the sexes in Drosophila simulans.

Rita M Graze, Lauren M McIntyre, Alison M Morse, Bret M Boyd, Sergey V Nuzhdin, Marta L Wayne

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetics · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rita M GrazeDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida.
Lauren M McIntyre
Alison M Morse
Bret M Boyd
Sergey V Nuzhdin
Marta L Wayne
University of Florida · USFlorida Museum of Natural History · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

Genetic variation of allele-specific transcriptome in DrosophilaR01GM077618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
Sigma virus in Drosophila: a model system for the evolution of virulenceR01GM083192 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI WAYNE, MARTA L · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
Quantitative Comparisons between genotypes and model speciesR01GM102227 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MCINTYRE, LAUREN M. · 2012 to 2015
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077618NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083192NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM083192NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102227NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM102227NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM77618NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM77618-S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanistic basis of regulatory variation and the prevailing evolutionary forces shaping that variation are known to differ between sexes and between chromosomes. Regulatory variation of gene expression can be due to functional changes within a gene itself (cis) or in other genes elsewhere in the genome (trans). The evolutionary properties of cis mutations are expected to differ from mutations affecting gene expression in trans. We analyze allele-specific expression across a set of X substitution lines in intact adult Drosophila simulans to evaluate whether regulatory variation differs for cis and trans, for males and females, and for X-linked and autosomal genes. Regulatory variation is common (56% of genes), and patterns of variation within D. simulans are consistent with previous observations in Drosophila that there is more cis than trans variation within species (47% vs. 25%, respectively). The relationship between sex-bias and sex-limited variation is remarkably consistent across sexes. However, there are differences between cis and trans effects: cis variants show evidence of purifying selection in the sex toward which expression is biased, while trans variants do not. For female-biased genes, the X is depleted for trans variation in a manner consistent with a female-dominated selection regime on the X. Surprisingly, there is no evidence for depletion of trans variation for male-biased genes on X. This is evidence for regulatory feminization of the X, trans-acting factors controlling male-biased genes are more likely to be found on the autosomes than those controlling female-biased genes.

Indexed as

AllelesGene Expression RegulationSex CharacteristicsAnimalsChromosomes, InsectDrosophilaFemaleMaleX Chromosomeallele-specific expressionCis/trans gene regulationsex-biased expressionX-chromosome

Identifiers

PMID24696400
PMCPMC4007535
OpenAlexW2120705827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.