ReviewNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2014
Spinal stimulation for pain: future applications.
Review in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal Cord Stimulation: Mechanisms of Action, Indications, Types, Complications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Electroceuticals: Unlocking the promise of therapies.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2024Review
- Cervical spinal cord stimulation for prevention and treatment of cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: clinical and radiographic outcomes of a prospective single-center clinical pilot study.Acta neurochirurgica · 2022Article
- Spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain: technical advances.The Korean journal of pain · 2020Review
- Neural engineering: the process, applications, and its role in the future of medicine.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Review
- Spinal Cord Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain: Current Trends and Future Applications.Brain sciences · 2018Review
- Incidence and predictive factors of spinal cord stimulation treatment after lumbar spine surgery.Journal of pain research · 2017Article
- Role of radiology in central nervous system stimulation.The British journal of radiology · 2015Review
- History and present state of targeted intrathecal drug delivery.Current pain and headache reports · 2015Review
- Nonpharmacological therapies for neurologic devices.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With continuous progress and rapid technological advancement of neuromodulation it is conceivable that within next decade or so, our approach to the electrical stimulation of the spinal cord used in treatment of chronic pain will change radically. The currently used spinal cord stimulation (SCS), with its procedural invasiveness, bulky devices, simplistic stimulation paradigms, and frustrating decline in effectiveness over time will be replaced by much more refined and individually tailored modality. Better understanding of underlying mechanism of action will allow us to use SCS in a more rational way, selecting patient-specific targets and techniques that properly fit each patient with chronic pain based on pain characteristics, distribution, and cause. Based on the information available today, this article will summarize emerging applications of SCS in the treatment of pain and theorize on further developments that may be introduced in the foreseeable future. An overview of clinical and technological innovations will serve as a basis for better understanding of SCS landscape for the next several years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.