ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2014
[Pitfalls in determining resistance].
Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selection of the optimal antimicrobial therapy is often crucial for the morbidity and mortality associated with an infection. A reliable antibiogram provides the basis for antibiotic therapy optimization. In case of life-threatening infections, minimal inhibitory concentration values should be available so that, in conjunction with knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of the respective antibiotics, a rational selection addressing the individual case is feasible. If only categorized results (susceptible, intermediate, resistant: S-I-R) are available, they should be established according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines in order to avoid therapeutic failures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24696279What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.