Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24696002›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2014

Endovascular treatment of symptomatic moyamoya.

Bradley A Gross, Ajith J Thomas, Kai U Frerichs

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bradley A GrossDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, bgross1@partners.org.
Ajith J Thomas
Kai U Frerichs

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moyamoya is a rare though important source of neurological morbidity as a result of both ischemic and hemorrhagic sequelae. Although a litany of series detailing the endovascular management of cerebral ischemia is present in the literature, only a paucity of such reports exists for moyamoya. A systematic review of the literature was performed for patients with moyamoya managed with endovascular techniques in addition to the contribution of an additional case managed at our institution. We evaluated treatment approach (angioplasty and/or stent), complications, and both angiographic and clinical outcomes at last follow-up. Results from a total of 28 endovascular procedures were collected (11 stenting, 17 angioplasty alone). Procedural success, defined as a lack of both angiographic and clinical recurrence at follow-up, was achieved after seven procedures (25 %). This rate did not significantly differ between disease type (moyamoya disease vs moyamoya syndrome, p = 1.0) and treatment approach (angioplasty alone vs stenting, p = 1.0). The overall monthly angiographic and clinical recurrence rates were 9.3 and 8.0 %, respectively. Clinically devastating intracerebral hemorrhage was seen after two procedures (7 %), and in an additional three procedures, the treated vessel could not be effectively dilated (11 %). There is no evidence that angioplasty or stenting improves the natural history of moyamoya. Both are associated with significant rates of early angiographic and/or clinical recurrence of symptoms. Taken with the risk of procedural complications, the current limited data should advise against attempted endovascular treatment of moyamoya.

Indexed as

AngioplastyEndovascular ProceduresHumansMoyamoya DiseaseStentsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.