ArticleDiabetologia2014
Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: rationale and design of the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium.
Article in Diabetologia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03814915 (DIabetes REsearCh on Patient straTification), which is not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DIabetes REsearCh on Patient straTification
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Pancreatic Beta-Cell Glucose Sensitivity.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Sustained influence of metformin therapy on circulating glucagon-like peptide-1 levels in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2017Trial
- A narrative review of what cohorts have taught us and how they have laid the foundation for much of our understanding of type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2026Review
- Type 2 diabetes risk alleles in peptidyl-glycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase influence GLP-1 levels and response to GLP-1 receptor agonists.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Bayesian network imputation methods applied to multi-omics data identify putative causal relationships in a type 2 diabetes dataset containing incomplete data: An IMI DIRECT Study.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Harnessing Pharmacomultiomics for Precision Medicine in Diabetes: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Review
- Role of human plasma metabolites in prediabetes and type 2 diabetes from the IMI-DIRECT study.Diabetologia · 2024Article
- The Association of Cardiometabolic, Diet and Lifestyle Parameters With Plasma Glucagon-like Peptide-1: An IMI DIRECT Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2024Article
- Exploring the design of clinical research studies on the efficacy mechanisms in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Altered blood gene expression in the obesity-related type 2 diabetes cluster may be causally involved in lipid metabolism: a Mendelian randomisation study.Diabetologia · 2023Article
- Discovery of drug-omics associations in type 2 diabetes with generative deep-learning models.Nature biotechnology · 2023Article
- Metabolic disorders and the risk of head and neck cancer: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Four groups of type 2 diabetes contribute to the etiological and clinical heterogeneity in newly diagnosed individuals: An IMI DIRECT study.Cell reports. Medicine · 2022Article
- Scientific Advances in Diabetes: The Impact of the Innovative Medicines Initiative.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Whole blood co-expression modules associate with metabolic traits and type 2 diabetes: an IMI-DIRECT study.Genome medicine · 2020Article
- Next-generation epidemiology: the role of high-resolution molecular phenotyping in diabetes research.Diabetologia · 2020Review
- Dietary metabolite profiling brings new insight into the relationship between nutrition and metabolic risk: An IMI DIRECT study.EBioMedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 18 institutions in 8 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe DIRECT (Diabetes Research on Patient Stratification) Study is part of a European Union Framework 7 Innovative Medicines Initiative project, a joint undertaking between four industry and 21 academic partners throughout Europe. The Consortium aims to discover and validate biomarkers that: (1) predict the rate of glycaemic deterioration before and after type 2 diabetes onset; (2) predict the response to diabetes therapies; and (3) help stratify type 2 diabetes into clearly definable disease subclasses that can be treated more effectively than without stratification. This paper describes two new prospective cohort studies conducted as part of DIRECT.
methodsPrediabetic participants (target sample size 2,200-2,700) and patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (target sample size ~1,000) are undergoing detailed metabolic phenotyping at baseline and 18 months and 36 months later. Abdominal, pancreatic and liver fat is assessed using MRI. Insulin secretion and action are assessed using frequently sampled OGTTs in non-diabetic participants, and frequently sampled mixed-meal tolerance tests in patients with type 2 diabetes. Biosamples include venous blood, faeces, urine and nail clippings, which, among other biochemical analyses, will be characterised at genetic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, proteomic and metagenomic levels. Lifestyle is assessed using high-resolution triaxial accelerometry, 24 h diet record, and food habit questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationDIRECT will yield an unprecedented array of biomaterials and data. This resource, available through managed access to scientists within and outside the Consortium, will facilitate the development of new treatments and therapeutic strategies for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.