ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2014
Differential regulation of primary afferent input to spinal cord by muscarinic receptor subtypes delineated using knockout mice.
Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- GαScience signaling · 2025Article
- RNA Interference Unleashed: Current Perspective of Small Interfering RNA (siRNA) Therapeutics in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- Exploring Cholinergic Compounds for Peripheral Neuropathic Pain Management: A Comprehensive Scoping Review of Rodent Model Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Acetylcholine and spinal locomotor networks: The insider.Physiological reports · 2021Review
- RE1-silencing transcription factor controls the acute-to-chronic neuropathic pain transition andThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018Article
- Regulating nociceptive transmission by VGluT2-expressing spinal dorsal horn neurons.Journal of neurochemistry · 2018Article
- Molecular, Cellular and Circuit Basis of Cholinergic Modulation of Pain.Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Physiological roles of CNS muscarinic receptors gained from knockout mice.Neuropharmacology · 2018Review
- Muscarinic receptors 2 and 5 regulate bitter response of urethral brush cells via negative feedback.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2018Article
- Cholinergic Nociceptive Mechanisms in Rat Meninges and Trigeminal Ganglia: Potential Implications for Migraine Pain.Frontiers in neurology · 2017Article
- Current and Future Issues in the Development of Spinal Agents for the Management of Pain.Current neuropharmacology · 2017Review
- Muscarinic receptor subtypes differentially control synaptic input and excitability of cerebellum-projecting medial vestibular nucleus neurons.Journal of neurochemistry · 2016Article
- Cholinergic mechanisms in spinal locomotion-potential target for rehabilitation approaches.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stimulation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) inhibits nociceptive transmission at the spinal level. However, it is unclear how each mAChR subtype regulates excitatory synaptic input from primary afferents. Here we examined excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) of dorsal horn neurons evoked by dorsal root stimulation in spinal cord slices from wild-type and mAChR subtype knock-out (KO) mice. In wild-type mice, mAChR activation with oxotremorine-M decreased the amplitude of monosynaptic EPSCs in ∼67% of neurons but increased it in ∼10% of neurons. The inhibitory effect of oxotremorine-M was attenuated by the M2/M4 antagonist himbacine in the majority of neurons, and the remaining inhibition was abolished by group II/III metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) antagonists in wild-type mice. In M2/M4 double-KO mice, oxotremorine-M inhibited monosynaptic EPSCs in significantly fewer neurons (∼26%) and increased EPSCs in significantly more neurons (33%) compared with wild-type mice. Blocking group II/III mGluRs eliminated the inhibitory effect of oxotremorine-M in M2/M4 double-KO mice. In M2 single-KO and M4 single-KO mice, himbacine still significantly reduced the inhibitory effect of oxotremorine-M. However, the inhibitory and potentiating effects of oxotremorine-M on EPSCs in M3 single-KO and M1/M3 double-KO mice were similar to those in wild-type mice. In M5 single-KO mice, oxotremorine-M failed to potentiate evoked EPSCs, and its inhibitory effect was abolished by himbacine. These findings indicate that activation of presynaptic M2 and M4 subtypes reduces glutamate release from primary afferents. Activation of the M5 subtype either directly increases primary afferent input or inhibits it through indirectly stimulating group II/III mGluRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.