Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24695456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Optogenetic patterning of whisker-barrel cortical system in transgenic rat expressing channelrhodopsin-2.

Tatsuya Honjoh, Zhi-Gang Ji, Yukinobu Yokoyama, Akira Sumiyoshi, Yuma Shibuya, Yoshiya Matsuzaka, Ryuta Kawashima, Hajime Mushiake, Toru Ishizuka, Hiromu Yawo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing sensory versus optogenetic network activation by combining (o)fMRI with optical Ca2+ recordings.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tatsuya HonjohDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan.
Zhi-Gang JiDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan.
Yukinobu YokoyamaDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan.
Akira SumiyoshiInstitute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yuma ShibuyaDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshiya MatsuzakaJapan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan; Department of Physiology, Tohoku University, Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ryuta KawashimaInstitute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Hajime MushiakeJapan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan; Department of Physiology, Tohoku University, Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Center for Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Toru IshizukaDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromu YawoDepartment of Developmental Biology and Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Life Sciences, Sendai, Japan; Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST), Core Research of Evolutional Science & Technology (CREST), Tokyo, Japan; Center for Neuroscience, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rodent whisker-barrel system has been an ideal model for studying somatosensory representations in the cortex. However, it remains a challenge to experimentally stimulate whiskers with a given pattern under spatiotemporal precision. Recently the optogenetic manipulation of neuronal activity has made possible the analysis of the neuronal network with precise spatiotemporal resolution. Here we identified the selective expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2), an algal light-driven cation channel, in the large mechanoreceptive neurons in the trigeminal ganglion (TG) as well as their peripheral nerve endings innervating the whisker follicles of a transgenic rat. The spatiotemporal pattern of whisker irradiation thus produced a barrel-cortical response with a specific spatiotemporal pattern as evidenced by electrophysiological and functional MRI (fMRI) studies. Our methods of generating an optogenetic tactile pattern (OTP) can be expected to facilitate studies on how the spatiotemporal pattern of touch is represented in the somatosensory cortex, as Hubel and Wiesel did in the visual cortex.

Indexed as

OptogeneticsAnimalsChannelrhodopsinsMagnetic Resonance ImagingRatsRats, TransgenicChannelrhodopsins

Identifiers

PMID24695456
PMCPMC3973546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.