Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24694926›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2014

A window into the intoxicated mind? Speech as an index of psychoactive drug effects.

Gillinder Bedi, Guillermo A Cecchi, Diego F Slezak, Facundo Carrillo, Mariano Sigman, Harriet de Wit

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. MDMA enhances positive affective responses to social feedback.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Detection of acute 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) effects across protocols using automated natural language processing.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Altered Insula Connectivity under MDMA.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  7. Intimate insight: MDMA changes how people talk about significant others.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2015
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gillinder Bedi1] Division on Substance Abuse, New York State Psychiatric Institute, and Department of Psychiatry, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA [2] Human Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Guillermo A CecchiComputational Biology Center-Neuroscience, IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA.
Diego F SlezakComputer Science Department, School of Sciences, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Facundo CarrilloComputer Science Department, School of Sciences, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Mariano SigmanPhysics Department, School of Sciences, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Harriet de WitHuman Behavioral Pharmacology Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Buenos Aires · ARBehavioral Pharma (United States) · USColumbia University · US

Funding

Re-Engineering Translational Research at the University of ChicagoUL1TR000430 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SOLWAY, JULIAN · 2012 to 2016
$20.2M
Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Decisions to Smoke Marijuana and Cocaine in HumansK23DA034877 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BEDI, GILLINDER I. · 2013 to 2017
$930k
Is Ecstasy an Empathogen? Effects of MDMA on Social and Emotional ProcessingR21DA026570 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2009 to 2010
$424k
Effects of MDMA ("ecstasy") and THC on Social ProcessingR03DA029679 · NIDA · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI BEDI, GILLINDER I. · 2011 to 2011
$247k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000430NIDA NIH HHS DA026570NIDA NIH HHS DA02812NIDA NIH HHS DA029679NIDA NIH HHS DA034877NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA034877NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R03 DA029679NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA026570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abused drugs can profoundly alter mental states in ways that may motivate drug use. These effects are usually assessed with self-report, an approach that is vulnerable to biases. Analyzing speech during intoxication may present a more direct, objective measure, offering a unique 'window' into the mind. Here, we employed computational analyses of speech semantic and topological structure after ±3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA; 'ecstasy') and methamphetamine in 13 ecstasy users. In 4 sessions, participants completed a 10-min speech task after MDMA (0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg), methamphetamine (20 mg), or placebo. Latent Semantic Analyses identified the semantic proximity between speech content and concepts relevant to drug effects. Graph-based analyses identified topological speech characteristics. Group-level drug effects on semantic distances and topology were assessed. Machine-learning analyses (with leave-one-out cross-validation) assessed whether speech characteristics could predict drug condition in the individual subject. Speech after MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) had greater semantic proximity than placebo to the concepts friend, support, intimacy, and rapport. Speech on MDMA (0.75 mg/kg) had greater proximity to empathy than placebo. Conversely, speech on methamphetamine was further from compassion than placebo. Classifiers discriminated between MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) and placebo with 88% accuracy, and MDMA (1.5 mg/kg) and methamphetamine with 84% accuracy. For the two MDMA doses, the classifier performed at chance. These data suggest that automated semantic speech analyses can capture subtle alterations in mental state, accurately discriminating between drugs. The findings also illustrate the potential for automated speech-based approaches to characterize clinically relevant alterations to mental state, including those occurring in psychiatric illness.

Indexed as

SemanticsAdolescentAdultArtificial IntelligenceDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIllicit DrugsMaleMental ProcessesMethamphetamineN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePattern Recognition, AutomatedPsychotropic DrugsSpeechSubstance-Related DisordersIllicit DrugsMethamphetamineN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePsychotropic Drugs

Identifiers

PMID24694926
PMCPMC4138742
OpenAlexW2038166296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.