ArticleHealth promotion international2015
Policies on pets for healthy cities: a conceptual framework.
Article in Health promotion international, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enduring strengths and a critical gap, the Ottawa Charter and animal rescue fostering in Aotearoa-New Zealand.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- The Creation of a Systematic Framework to Assess Dog Laws and Their Relationship to Societal Changes in the United Kingdom.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- One health: a structured review and commentary on trends and themes.One health outlook · 2024Review
- Companion Animal Fostering as Health Promotion: A Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- One Digital Health Intervention for Monitoring Human and Animal Welfare in Smart Cities: Viewpoint and Use Case.JMIR medical informatics · 2023Article
- Understanding the Role of Therapy Dogs in Human Health Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Fecal contamination of urban parks by domestic dogs and tragedy of the commons.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Leashes, Litterboxes, and Lifelines: Exploring Volunteer-Based Pet Care Assistance Programs for Older Adults.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Design Challenges for Dog Ownership and Dog Walking in Dense Urban Areas: The Case of Japan.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Representations of Free-Living and Unrestrained Dogs as an Emerging Public Health Issue in Australian Newspapers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Measuring Changes in Perceptions of Access to Pet Support Care in Underserved Communities.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- How pets factor into healthcare decisions for COVID-19: A One Health perspective.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- One Health promotion and the politics of dog management in remote, northern Australian communities.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Insights about the Epidemiology of Dog Bites in a Canadian City Using a Dog Aggression Scale and Administrative Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019Article
- "Pets Negotiable": How Do the Perspectives of Landlords and Property Managers Compare with Those of Younger Tenants with Dogs?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2018Article
- Article
- "But-He'll Fall!": Children with Autism, Interspecies Intersubjectivity, and the Problem of 'Being Social'.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Drawing on the One Health concept, and integrating a dual focus on public policy and practices of caring from the Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, we outline a conceptual framework to help guide the development and assessment of local governments' policies on pets. This framework emphasizes well-being in human populations, while recognizing that these outcomes relate to the well-being of non-human animals. Five intersecting spheres of activity, each associated with local governments' jurisdiction over pets, are presented: (i) preventing threats and nuisances from pets, (ii) meeting pets' emotional and physical needs, (iii) procuring pets ethically, (iv) providing pets with veterinary services and (v) licensing and identifying pets. This conceptual framework acknowledges the tenets of previous health promotion frameworks, including overlapping and intersecting influences. At the same time, this framework proposes to advance our understanding of health promotion and, more broadly, population health by underscoring interdependence between people and pets as well as the dynamism of urbanized ecologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.