Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24694327›Full record

ArticleAIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education2014

Trends in HIV prevalence and risk behavior among men who have sex with men in New York City, 2004-2011.

Kathleen H Reilly, Alan Neaigus, Samuel M Jenness, Travis Wendel, Holly Hagan, David M Marshall, Christopher S Murrill, Beryl A Koblin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Persistent Racial Disparities in HIV Infection in the USA: HIV Prevalence Matters.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2017
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kathleen H Reilly
Alan Neaigus
Samuel M Jenness
Travis Wendel
Holly Hagan
David M Marshall
Christopher S Murrill
Beryl A Koblin

Funding

Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURRAN, SARA R. · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
NCHHSTP CDC HHS U1B PS003246NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828PHS HHS 1U1BPS003246-01PHS HHS U62/CCU223595-02-3PHS HHS U62/CCU223595-03-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined trends in HIV prevalence and HIV-related risk behaviors from 2004 through 2011 among men who have sex with men (MSM) in New York City. MSM were venue-sampled, interviewed, and offered HIV testing in serial cross-sectional studies. Significant differences in overall time trends were determined using the Spearman rank correlation and logistic regression models. There were 457 (2004-2005), 550 (2008), and 510 (2011) participants in each study round. There was no significant trend in HIV prevalence over time, and past 12 month unprotected anal intercourse remained steady. However, drug use and number of sex partners declined. Among those who did not self-report being HIV positive, the percentage that tested for HIV in the past 12 months increased. The results from this study suggest that from 2004 through 2011 more MSM in New York City are being tested for HIV and have declining drug use and fewer sex partners.

Indexed as

Risk-TakingSexual PartnersAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNew York CityPrevalenceRisk FactorsSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID24694327
PMCPMC8284873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.