Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24694275›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2014

Incidence of fractures requiring inpatient care.

Axel Somersalo, Juha Paloneva, Hannu Kautiainen, Eija Lönnroos, Mikko Heinänen, Ilkka Kiviranta

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03172715 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prosthesis Versus Osteosynthesis in Treatment of Intra-articular Fractures of Proximal Tibia: A Randomized, Controlled, Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentral Finland Hospital DistrictRan2018 to 2029Enrolled98ConditionsTibial FracturesArmsLocking plate, TKR
NCT07521696 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Physical Recovery During Bracing After Ankle Fracture (Re-BAF): A Multi-Center Superiority Analysis Nested Within a Non-inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial (BAF; NCT07163091)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOdense University HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled280ConditionsAnkle Fracture, Recovery, Physical Activity, RehabilitationArmsAnkle stirrup, Foot-ankle brace
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Does using 3D printed models for pre-operative planning improve surgical outcomes of foot and ankle fracture fixation? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Compression therapy after ankle fracture surgery: a systematic review.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Wound complications after ankle surgery. Does compression treatment work? A randomized, controlled trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Excess subsequent fracture and mortality risk after ankle fractures: a relative survival analysis of the 45 and Up Study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Differences in hospital length of stay and total hospital charge by income level in patients hospitalized for hip fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Axel SomersaloDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology , University of Helsinki.
Juha Paloneva
Hannu Kautiainen
Eija Lönnroos
Mikko Heinänen
Ilkka Kiviranta

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe overall incidence of fractures has been addressed in several studies, but there are few data on different types of fractures that require inpatient care, even though they account for considerable healthcare costs. We determined the incidence of limb and spine fractures that required hospitalization in people aged ≥ 16 years. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe collected data on the diagnosis (ICD10 code), procedure code (NOMESCO), and 9 additional characteristics of patients admitted to the trauma ward of Central Finland Hospital between 2002 and 2008. Incidence rates were calculated for all fractures using data on the population at risk. RESULTS AND

interpretationDuring the study period, 3,277 women and 2,708 men sustained 3,750 and 3,030 fractures, respectively. The incidence of all fractures was 4.9 per 10(3) person years (95% CI: 4.8-5.0). The corresponding numbers for women and men were 5.3 (5.1-5.4) and 4.5 (4.3-4.6). Fractures of the hip, ankle, wrist, spine, and proximal humerus comprised two-thirds of all fractures requiring hospitalization. The proportion of ankle fractures (17%) and wrist fractures (9%) was equal to that of hip fractures (27%). Four-fifths of the hospitalized fracture patients were operated. In individuals aged < 60 years, fractures requiring hospitalization were twice as common in men as in women. In individuals ≥ 60 years of age, the opposite was true.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAnkle FracturesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFinlandFractures, BoneHip FracturesHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID24694275
PMCPMC4164872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.