SynthesisActa orthopaedica2014
Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of 49 studies.
Synthesis in Acta orthopaedica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
67 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 138 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Similar 2 year migration patterns for a shortened and a distally reduced stem design in uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis.Acta orthopaedica · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Anatomical features of Vietnamese hip joints and assessment of the efficacy of short-stem hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head, 2011-2022.Orthopedic reviews · 2026Article
- Is Collum Femoris Preserving Stem (CFP) an Epiphyseal-Stabilized Prosthesis? A Long-Term Single-Center Series Follow Up of 705 Cases.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties Using Short Femoral Stems: Is It Possible?Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
- Do Cumulative Revision Rate and First-time Re-revision Rate Vary Between Short and Standard Femoral Stem Lengths? A Multinational Registry Study.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Mid-term outcomes after primary total hip arthroplasty with a cemented short stem in an elderly patient cohort.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Observational
- Learning curve comparison between switching approach and switching implant in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Native hip geometry restoration in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of eight different short stems.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Article
- Do all short stem types restore biomechanical parameters of the hip? Comparison according to femoral neck osteotomy levels.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes of the mayo conservative hip system in patients aged 30 years or less with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: mean follow-up of more than 10 years.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Total Hip Replacement with a Fully Hydroxyapatite-Coated Shortened Stem: Five- to Thirteen-Year Follow-Up Results.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Midterm Comparative Analysis of Short Femoral Stem Survivorship in Dorr Type A Femurs.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2024Article
- Mid-term survival of the Optimys short stem: A prospective case series of 500 patients.World journal of orthopedics · 2024Article
- Short stem hip arthroplasty with the optimys prosthesis is a safe and effective option for obese patients: a mid-term follow-up multicenter study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Observational
- Ten-year follow-up and clinical outcome of a metaphyseal anchoring short hip stem prosthesis: a retrospective single-centre analysis.International orthopaedics · 2024Article
- A neck-sparing short stem shows significantly lower blood loss in total hip arthroplasty compared to a neck-resecting short stem.Scientific reports · 2023Article
7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeThe aim of short-stem total hip arthroplasty is to preserve proximal bone stock for future revisions, to improve biomechanical reconstruction, and to make minimally invasive approaches easier. It is therefore being increasingly considered to be a sound alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty, especially for young and active patients. However, it is still unknown whether survival rates of short-stem hips match current standards. We made a systematic summary of reported overall survival after short-stem total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of English, French, German, and Dutch literature. 2 assessors independently identified clinical studies on short-stem hip arthroplasty. After recalculating reported revision rates, we determined whether each implant had a projected revision rate of 10% or less at 10 years of follow-up or a revision rate per 100 observed component years of 1 or less. Stems were classified as "collum", "partial collum", or "trochanter-sparing". RESULTS AND
interpretationWe found 49 studies, or 51 cohorts, involving 19 different stems. There was a large increase in recent publications. The majority of studies included had a follow-up of less than 5 years. We found a large number of observational studies on "partial collum" and "trochanter-sparing" stems, demonstrating adequate survival rates at medium-term follow-up. Clinical evidence from "collum stem" studies was limited to a small number of studies with a medium-term follow-up period. These studies did not show a satisfactory overall survival rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.