Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24693427›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of proteomics2014

Protein-protein interaction detection: methods and analysis.

V Srinivasa Rao, K Srinivas, G N Sujini, G N Sunand Kumar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of proteomics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 309 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
309citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

309 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structural modeling supports an interaction between thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Linear-time prediction of proteome-scale microbial protein interactions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

249 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

V Srinivasa RaoDepartment of CSE, VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada 520007, India.
K SrinivasDepartment of CSE, VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada 520007, India.
G N SujiniDepartment of CSE, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Technology, Hyderabad 500075, India.
G N Sunand KumarDepartment of CSE, VR Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada 520007, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction plays key role in predicting the protein function of target protein and drug ability of molecules. The majority of genes and proteins realize resulting phenotype functions as a set of interactions. The in vitro and in vivo methods like affinity purification, Y2H (yeast 2 hybrid), TAP (tandem affinity purification), and so forth have their own limitations like cost, time, and so forth, and the resultant data sets are noisy and have more false positives to annotate the function of drug molecules. Thus, in silico methods which include sequence-based approaches, structure-based approaches, chromosome proximity, gene fusion, in silico 2 hybrid, phylogenetic tree, phylogenetic profile, and gene expression-based approaches were developed. Elucidation of protein interaction networks also contributes greatly to the analysis of signal transduction pathways. Recent developments have also led to the construction of networks having all the protein-protein interactions using computational methods for signaling pathways and protein complex identification in specific diseases.

Identifiers

PMID24693427
PMCPMC3947875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.