Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24692642›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2014

Polymeric microspheres as protein transduction reagents.

David Nagel, Jonathan M Behrendt, Gwen F Chimonides, Elizabeth E Torr, Andrew Devitt, Andrew J Sutherland, Anna V Hine

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David NagelFrom the ‡School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK;
Jonathan M Behrendt§School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK;
Gwen F Chimonides§School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK;
Elizabeth E TorrFrom the ‡School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK;
Andrew DevittFrom the ‡School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK; ‖Aston Research Centre for Healthy Aging, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Andrew J Sutherland§School of Engineering and Applied Science, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK;
Anna V HineFrom the ‡School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK; a.v.hine@aston.ac.uk.
Aston University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E002080/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovering the function of an unknown protein, particularly one with neither structural nor functional correlates, is a daunting task. Interaction analyses determine binding partners, whereas DNA transfection, either transient or stable, leads to intracellular expression, though not necessarily at physiologically relevant levels. In theory, direct intracellular protein delivery (protein transduction) provides a conceptually simpler alternative, but in practice the approach is problematic. Domains such as HIV TAT protein are valuable, but their effectiveness is protein specific. Similarly, the delivery of intact proteins via endocytic pathways (e.g. using liposomes) is problematic for functional analysis because of the potential for protein degradation in the endosomes/lysosomes. Consequently, recent reports that microspheres can deliver bio-cargoes into cells via a non-endocytic, energy-independent pathway offer an exciting and promising alternative for in vitro delivery of functional protein. In order for such promise to be fully exploited, microspheres are required that (i) are stably linked to proteins, (ii) can deliver those proteins with good efficiency, (iii) release functional protein once inside the cells, and (iv) permit concomitant tracking. Herein, we report the application of microspheres to successfully address all of these criteria simultaneously, for the first time. After cellular uptake, protein release was autocatalyzed by the reducing cytoplasmic environment. Outside of cells, the covalent microsphere-protein linkage was stable for ≥90 h at 37 °C. Using conservative methods of estimation, 74.3% ± 5.6% of cells were shown to take up these microspheres after 24 h of incubation, with the whole process of delivery and intracellular protein release occurring within 36 h. Intended for in vitro functional protein research, this approach will enable study of the consequences of protein delivery at physiologically relevant levels, without recourse to nucleic acids, and offers a useful alternative to commercial protein transfection reagents such as Chariot™. We also provide clear immunostaining evidence to resolve residual controversy surrounding FACS-based assessment of microsphere uptake.

Indexed as

MicrospheresDNAEndosomesHumansPolymersProtein BindingProteinsDNAPolymersProteins

Identifiers

PMID24692642
PMCPMC4047473
OpenAlexW2169189764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.