Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24692332›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2014

Construct validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System gastrointestinal symptom scales in systemic sclerosis.

Vivek Nagaraja, Ron D Hays, Puja P Khanna, Brennan M R Spiegel, Lin Chang, Gil Y Melmed, Roger Bolus, Dinesh Khanna

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Patient-reported outcome instruments in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis.Journal of scleroderma and related disorders · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Colonic and Anorectal Manifestations of Systemic Sclerosis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Management of gastrointestinal involvement in scleroderma.Current treatment options in rheumatology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vivek NagarajaUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ron D Hays
Puja P Khanna
Brennan M R Spiegel
Lin Chang
Gil Y Melmed
Roger Bolus
Dinesh Khanna

Funding

The Center for Health Improvement of Minority ElderlyP30AG021684 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Homero Erwin del Pino · 2002 to 2026
$19.7M
TRAINING COREP20MD000182 · NIMHD · CHARLES R. DREW UNIVERSITY OF MED &SCI · PI CUNNINGHAM, WILLIAM EMERY, SHAPIRO, MARTIN F. · 2002 to 2016
$16.5M
NIH PROMIS Statistical Coordinating Center(RMI)U01AR052177 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI CELLA, DAVID · 2004 to 2010
$10.6M
UCLA OLDER AMERICANS INDEPENDENCE CENTERP30AG028748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI IRWIN, MICHAEL R · 2006 to 2017
$9.8M
Validating and Extending the PROMIS Sexual Function Measure for Clinical ResearchU01AR052186 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WEINFURT, KEVIN P · 2004 to 2013
$9.5M
PROMIS Pediatrics: Longitudinal Validation and Linking Pediatric and Adult Item BU01AR052181 · NIAMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REEVE, BRYCE B · 2004 to 2013
$9.1M
Patient reported outcomes in routine clinical care of patients infected with HIVU01AR057954 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M., CRANE, PAUL K · 2009 to 2013
$7.8M
Validation and domain development in mental health and sleep-wake functionU01AR052155 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PILKONIS, PAUL A · 2004 to 2013
$6.0M
Validation of PROMIS in Diverse Cancer PopulationsU01AR057971 · NIAMS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MOINPOUR, CAROL M, POTOSKY, ARNOLD L · 2009 to 2013
$5.7M
Improving Assessment of Physical Function and Drug Safety in Health and DiseaseU01AR052158 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNAN, ESWAR · 2004 to 2013
$5.6M
PROMIS Technical CenterU54AR057943 · NIAMS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GERSHON, RICHARD · 2009 to 2013
$5.3M
UW Center on Outcomes Research in Rehabilitation(RMI)U01AR052171 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI AMTMANN, DAGMAR · 2004 to 2008
$5.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR063120NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052155NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052158NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052170NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052171NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052177NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052181NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR052186NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057929NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057936NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057940NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057948NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057954NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057956NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057967NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR057971NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057926NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057943NIAMS NIH HHS U54 AR057951NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021684NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028748NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGastrointestinal (GI) involvement is common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) GI symptom item bank captures upper and lower GI symptoms (reflux, disrupted swallowing, nausea/vomiting, belly pain, gas/bloating/flatulence, diarrhea, constipation, and fecal incontinence). The objective of this study was to evaluate the construct validity of the PROMIS GI bank in SSc.

methodsA total of 167 patients with SSc were administered the PROMIS GI bank and the University of California, Los Angeles, Scleroderma Clinical Trials Consortium Gastrointestinal Scale (GIT 2.0) instrument. GIT 2.0 is a multi-item instrument that measures SSc-associated GI symptoms. Product-moment correlations and a multitrait-multimethod analysis of the PROMIS GI scales with the GIT 2.0 symptom scales were used to evaluate convergent and discriminant validity.

resultsPatients with SSc GI involvement had PROMIS GI scale scores 0.2-0.7 SD worse than the US general population. Correlations among scales measuring the same domains for the PROMIS GI and GIT 2.0 measures were large, ranging from 0.61 to 0.87 (average r = 0.77). The average correlation between different symptom scales was 0.22, supporting discriminant validity.

conclusionThis study provides support for the construct validity of the PROMIS GI scales in SSc. Future research is needed to assess the responsiveness to change of these scales in patients with SSc.

Indexed as

Patient Outcome AssessmentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Outcome Assessment, Health CarePrevalenceReproducibility of ResultsScleroderma, SystemicSelf ReportSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID24692332
PMCPMC4182150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.