ArticleLiver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society2014
Decision making in liver transplantation--limited application of the liver donor risk index.
Article in Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A rapid, reproducible, noninvasive predictor of liver graft survival.The Journal of surgical research · 2015Trial
- A donor-recipient ranking model to optimize long-term survival post liver transplant.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Graft quality assessment during machine perfusion in liver transplantation: a review of current evidence and emerging strategies.Frontiers in transplantation · 2026Review
- Perspectives and Tools in Liver Graft Assessment: A Transformative Era in Liver Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Use of machine learning models for the prognostication of liver transplantation: A systematic review.World journal of transplantation · 2024Article
- Designing a Liver Transplant Patient and Family Decision Support Tool for Organ Offer Decisions.Transplantation direct · 2021Article
- Article
- Application of Indocyanine Green (ICG) Detection in Evaluating Early Prognosis in Patients with Fatty Liver Disease After Liver Transplantation.Annals of transplantation · 2017Article
- Machine-Learning Algorithms Predict Graft Failure After Liver Transplantation.Transplantation · 2017Article
- Changes in Discard Rate After the Introduction of the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI).American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2016Article
- The corrected donor age for hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The liver donor risk index (LDRI), originally developed in 2006 by Feng et al. and since modified, is a method of evaluating liver grafts from deceased donors through the determination of the relative risk of graft failure after transplantation. Online and paper surveys about attitudes and practices regarding decision making in liver transplantation and the role of the LDRI were sent to liver transplant physicians. One hundred forty-seven of 401 eligible respondents (37%) returned partial or complete surveys. The majority of the respondents were male (116/134 or 87%) and practiced in academic medical centers (128/138 or 93%). Transplant coordinators initially contacted the candidate with an offer in 81% of the programs. Eighty-eight of 143 respondents (62%) reported that they were very familiar with the LDRI, but the vast majority (114/137 or 83%) rarely or never discussed the concept of the LDRI with their patients. A majority of the respondents (96/132 or 73%) believed that the LDRI does not adequately describe a liver's relative risk of graft failure and that there are factors making the LDRI potentially misleading (122/138 or 88%). Nevertheless, 60 of 130 respondents (46%) believed that the LDRI would increase/improve shared decision making. The LDRI has not been widely adopted because of concerns that (1) it does not accurately reflect posttransplant survival, (2) it excludes relevant donor and recipient factors, and (3) it is too complicated for candidates to grasp. There is a need to improve it or to develop other decision-making tools to help promote shared decision making. There is also great diversity in how liver offers are made to ambulatory candidates and in how transplant programs address a candidate's refusal. Research is needed to determine evidence-based best practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.