Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24692192›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2014

Epidermal barriers.

Ken Natsuga

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The 4E-BP1 deletion modestly mitigates mTORC1-deficient epidermal barrier defects.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Engineered Tissue Models to Decode Host-Microbiota Interactions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Collagen XVII deficiency alters epidermal patterning.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Biomarkers and Detection Platforms for Human Health and Performance Monitoring: A Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken NatsugaDepartment of Dermatology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermis functions as a physical barrier to the external environment and works to prevent loss of water from the skin. Numerous factors have been implicated in the formation of epidermal barriers, such as cornified envelopes, corneocytes, lipids, junctional proteins, proteases, protease inhibitors, antimicrobial peptides, and transcription factors. This review illustrates human diseases (ichthyoses) and animal models in which the epidermal barrier is disrupted or dysfunctional at steady state owing to ablation of one or more of the above factors. These diseases and animal models help us to understand the complicated mechanisms of epidermal barrier formation and give further insights on epidermal development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomarkersEpidermisHumansIchthyosisLipid MetabolismSerine ProteasesSerine Proteinase InhibitorsSkin Physiological PhenomenaTight JunctionsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBiomarkersSerine ProteasesSerine Proteinase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID24692192
PMCPMC3968788
OpenAlexW4211026213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.