Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24691885›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Nutrition outcomes following implementation of validated swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer.

Teresa Brown, Lynda Ross, Lee Jones, Brett Hughes, Merrilyn Banks

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinical predictors for reactive tube feeding in patients with advanced oropharynx cancer receiving radiotherapy ± chemotherapy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. On the need for comprehensive assessment of impact of comorbidity in elderly patients with head and neck cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Teresa BrownDepartment of Nutrition & Dietetics, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Level 2, James Mayne Building, Butterfield St, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia, teresa.brown@health.qld.gov.au.
Lynda Ross
Lee Jones
Brett Hughes
Merrilyn Banks
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHead and neck cancer patients have a high risk of malnutrition and swallowing dysfunction. This study reports on adherence and nutrition outcomes with the use of local evidence-based guidelines for the nutrition management of patients with head and neck cancer, including placement of proactive gastrostomy tubes for high risk patients.

methodsThis study is a prospective observational audit in patients treated for head and neck cancer at a tertiary hospital from 2007 to 2008 (n = 539). Nutrition outcomes (weight, nutritional status and type of nutrition support) were compared for each nutrition risk category. Primary outcome was 10 % or more weight loss at 3 months post-treatment (n = 219).

resultsOverall adherence to the guideline tube feeding recommendations was 81 %. High risk patients had mean weight loss of 6 % on completion of treatment and 9 % at 3 months post-treatment, despite the majority having a proactive gastrostomy tube. Medium and low risk patients also lost weight over this time. Univariate analysis found that non-adherence to the guidelines was associated with weight loss at 3 months (p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis found overweight patients had 1.82 greater odds, and obese patients had 3.49 greater odds of losing weight (p = 0.021). Patients with significant weight loss at diagnosis had decreased odds of losing weight later (p = 0.011).

conclusionClinically significant weight loss was still prevalent in this population despite proactive interventions. Predictors of weight loss support the evidence-based guidelines' risk categories, and adherence was important to improve outcomes. Further research is required to determine the impact of significant weight loss in patients with high body mass index (BMI).

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusNutrition PolicyWeight LossAgedBody Mass IndexDeglutitionDeglutition DisordersFemaleGastrostomyGuideline AdherenceHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional SupportProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID24691885
OpenAlexW2071415246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.