Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24691684›Full record

ArticleCancer2014

Striking dichotomy in outcome of MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma in the contemporary era.

Brian H Kushner, Shakeel Modak, Kim Kramer, Michael P LaQuaglia, Karima Yataghene, Ellen M Basu, Stephen S Roberts, Nai-Kong V Cheung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian H KushnerDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Shakeel Modak
Kim Kramer
Michael P LaQuaglia
Karima Yataghene
Ellen M Basu
Stephen S Roberts
Nai-Kong V Cheung
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Project 5P01CA106450 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI O'REILLY, RICHARD JOHN · 2005 to 2009
$12.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA10450NCI NIH HHS P01 CA106450NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe authors exploited a large database to investigate the outcomes of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma in the contemporary era.

methodsAll patients with high-risk neuroblastoma aged <12 years who were treated during induction at the authors' institution from 2000 through 2011 were studied, including 118 patients with MYCN-amplified [MYCN(+)] disease and 127 patients aged >18 months with MYCN-nonamplified [MYCN(-)] stage 4 disease.

resultsA complete response/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) to induction was correlated with significantly superior event-free survival (EFS) (P < .001) and overall survival (OS) (P < .001) compared with a partial response or less. Patients with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease had similar rates of CR/VGPR to induction (P = .366), and those with MYCN(+) and MYCN(-) disease who attained a CR/VGPR had similar EFS (P = .346) and OS (P = .542). In contrast, only MYCN(+) patients had progressive disease as a response to induction (P < .001), and early death from progressive disease (<366 days after diagnosis) was significantly more common (P < .001) among those with MYCN(+) disease. Overall, among patients who had a partial response or less, MYCN(+) patients had significantly inferior EFS (P < .001) and OS (P < .001) compared with MYCN(-) patients, which accounted for the significantly worse EFS (P = .008) and OS (P = .002) for the entire MYCN(+) cohort versus the MYCN(-) cohort.

conclusionsPatients with MYCN(-), high-risk neuroblastoma display a broad, continuous spectrum with regard to response and outcome, whereas MYCN(+) patients either have an excellent response to induction associated with good long-term outcome or develop early progressive disease with a poor outcome. This extreme dichotomy in the clinical course of MYCN(+) patients points to underlying biologic differences with MYCN(+) neuroblastoma, the elucidation of which may have far-reaching implications, including improved risk classification at diagnosis and the identification of targets for treatment.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInfantKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleNeoplasm StagingNeuroblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsMYCN protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinNuclear ProteinsOncogene Proteinscontemporary therapyinductionMYCNneuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID24691684
PMCPMC4326052
OpenAlexW1546483925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.