Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24690894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Effects of green tea compound epigallocatechin-3-gallate against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and biofilm.

Pedrina G Vidigal, Mathias Müsken, Katrin A Becker, Susanne Häussler, Jost Wingender, Eike Steinmann, Jan Kehrmann, Erich Gulbins, Jan Buer, Peter Michael Rath and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The role of nanocomposites against biofilm infections in humans.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Frontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Pedrina G VidigalInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Mathias MüskenInstitute for Molecular Bacteriology, TWINCORE, Center for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Hannover, Germany; Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Katrin A BeckerInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Susanne HäusslerInstitute for Molecular Bacteriology, TWINCORE, Center for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Hannover, Germany; Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Helmholtz Center for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Jost WingenderBiofilm Center, Department of Aquatic Microbiology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Eike SteinmannDivision of Experimental Virology, TWINCORE, Center for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, Hannover, Germany.
Jan KehrmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Erich GulbinsInstitute of Molecular Biology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jan BuerInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Peter Michael RathInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Jörg SteinmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
University of Duisburg-Essen · DECenter for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research · DEHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research · DEInstitute of Molecular Biology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated the in vitro and in vivo activities of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCg), a green tea component, against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Sm) isolates from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In vitro effects of EGCg and the antibiotic colistin (COL) on growth inhibition, survival, and also against young and mature biofilms of S. maltophilia were determined. Qualitative and quantitative changes on the biofilms were assessed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Further, in vivo effects of nebulized EGCg in C57BL/6 and Cftr mutant mice during acute Sm lung infection were evaluated. Subinhibitory concentrations of EGCg significantly reduced not only biofilm formation, but also the quantity of viable cells in young and mature biofilms. CLSM showed that EGCg-exposed biofilms exhibited either a change in total biofilm biovolume or an increase of the fraction of dead cells contained within the biofilm in a dose depended manner. Sm infected wild-type and Cftr mutant mice treated with 1,024 mg/L EGCg by inhalation exhibited significantly lower bacterial counts than those undergoing no treatment or treated with COL. EGCg displayed promising inhibitory and anti-biofilm properties against CF Sm isolates in vitro and significantly reduced Sm bacterial counts in an acute infection model with wild type and CF mice. This natural compound may represent a novel therapeutic agent against Sm infection in CF.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial LoadBiofilmsCatechinColistinFemaleInstillation, DrugKineticsMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Mutant StrainsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStenotrophomonas maltophiliaTeaCatechinColistinepigallocatechin gallateTea

Identifiers

PMID24690894
PMCPMC3972220
OpenAlexW2040526505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.