Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24690624›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2014

Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies and randomised trials.

Evropi Theodoratou, Ioanna Tzoulaki, Lina Zgaga, John P A Ioannidis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03018132 (The PROVIDE Study; Preeclampsia Research on Vitamin D, Inflammation, & Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 438 papers, 52 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
438citing papers in PubMed, 52 pooled it
76.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03018132 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

The PROVIDE Study; Preeclampsia Research on Vitamin D, Inflammation, & Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2017 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsPre-Eclampsia, Depression, Inflammation, Vitamin D DeficiencyArmsmental health screening, education and referral program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

438 citing papers in PubMed, 52 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 968 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Bladder cancer risk factors: a comprehensive umbrella review of meta-analyses.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease: an umbrella review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Efficacy and safety of tai chi exercise on bone health: An umbrella review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2023
    Pooled it
  20. Pooled it

378 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Evropi TheodoratouCentre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Ioanna Tzoulaki
Lina Zgaga
John P A Ioannidis
Stanford Health Care · USTrinity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Ioannina · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the breadth, validity, and presence of biases of the associations of vitamin D with diverse outcomes.

designUmbrella review of the evidence across systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D or 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D concentrations and randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and screening of citations and references. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Three types of studies were eligible for the umbrella review: systematic reviews and meta-analyses that examined observational associations between circulating vitamin D concentrations and any clinical outcome; and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials assessing supplementation with vitamin D or active compounds (both established and newer compounds of vitamin D).

results107 systematic literature reviews and 74 meta-analyses of observational studies of plasma vitamin D concentrations and 87 meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation were identified. The relation between vitamin D and 137 outcomes has been explored, covering a wide range of skeletal, malignant, cardiovascular, autoimmune, infectious, metabolic, and other diseases. Ten outcomes were examined by both meta-analyses of observational studies and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials, but the direction of the effect and level of statistical significance was concordant only for birth weight (maternal vitamin D status or supplementation). On the basis of the available evidence, an association between vitamin D concentrations and birth weight, dental caries in children, maternal vitamin D concentrations at term, and parathyroid hormone concentrations in patients with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis is probable, but further studies and better designed trials are needed to draw firmer conclusions. In contrast to previous reports, evidence does not support the argument that vitamin D only supplementation increases bone mineral density or reduces the risk of fractures or falls in older people.

conclusionsDespite a few hundred systematic reviews and meta-analyses, highly convincing evidence of a clear role of vitamin D does not exist for any outcome, but associations with a selection of outcomes are probable.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicObservational Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicVitamin DVitamins1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin DVitamins

Identifiers

PMID24690624
PMCPMC3972415
OpenAlexW2147466732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.