Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24690616›Full record

ReviewTopics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI2014

MRI phenotype in renal cancer: is it clinically relevant?

Naomi Campbell, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Ivan Pedrosa

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Use of quantitative T2 mapping for the assessment of renal cell carcinomas: first results.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Radiomics in Kidney Cancer: MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2019
    Review
  20. CT and MRI of small renal masses.The British journal of radiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi CampbellFrom the *Department of Radiology, Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY; and †Department of Radiology and ‡Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
Andrew B Rosenkrantz
Ivan Pedrosa
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

NON-INVASIVE PHYSIOLOGIC PREDICTORS OF AGGRESSIVENESS IN RENAL CELL CARCINOMAR01CA154475 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI PEDROSA, IVAN · 2011 to 2024
$4.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is most commonly diagnosed as an incidental finding on cross-sectional imaging and represents a significant clinical challenge. Although most patients have a surgically curable lesion at the time of diagnosis, the variability in the biologic behavior of the different histologic subtypes and tumor grade of RCC, together with the increasing array of management options, creates uncertainty for the optimal clinical approach to individual patients. State-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides a comprehensive assessment of renal lesions that includes multiple forms of tissue contrast as well as functional parameters, which in turn provides information that helps to address this dilemma. In this article, we review this evolving and increasingly comprehensive role of MRI in the detection, characterization, perioperative evaluation, and assessment of the treatment response of renal neoplasms. We emphasize the ability of the imaging "phenotype" of renal masses on MRI to help predict the histologic subtype, grade, and clinical behavior of RCC.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCarcinoma, Renal CellHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedKidney NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID24690616
PMCPMC4484274
OpenAlexW2321027862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.