Trial reportThe Journal of pediatrics2014
Comparison of devices for newborn ventilation in the delivery room.
Trial report in The Journal of pediatrics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02629887 (Non-inflatable Supraglottic Airway), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Non-inflatable Supraglottic Airway (NI-SGA) vs. Face Mask (FM) as a Primary Interface Device for Neonatal Resuscitation: A Pilot Study
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026Guideline
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- 2020 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Part 8. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2021Guideline
- Sustained Inflation vs Standard Resuscitation for Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome - 2019 Update.Neonatology · 2019Guideline
- Relationship between applied face mask force and mask leak during simulated neonatal ventilation: a randomised simulation study.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2025Trial
- Helping babies breathe better in the delivery room.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Outcomes of preterm infants stabilized with flow-inflating bag or T-piece resuscitator at birth-a Canadian neonatal network cohort study.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Electronic Heart (ECG) Monitoring at Birth and Newborn Resuscitation.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Respiratory Management of the Preterm Infant: Supporting Evidence-Based Practice at the Bedside.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Risk calculator for advanced neonatal resuscitation.BMJ paediatrics open · 2022Article
- Article
- Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2021.Singapore medical journal · 2021Article
- T-piece resuscitator or self-inflating bag during neonatal resuscitation: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2021Article
- [Newborn resuscitation and support of transition of infants at birth].Notfall & rettungsmedizin · 2021Review
- Effect of T-Piece Resuscitator versus Self Inflating Bag on Arterial COIndian journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
- Effective ventilation: The most critical intervention for successful delivery room resuscitation.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2018Review
- Preventing Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Failure: Evidence-Based and Physiologically Sound Practices from Delivery Room to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Clinics in perinatology · 2018Review
- Article
- Impact of Changing Clinical Practices on Early Blood Gas Analyses in Very Preterm Infants and Their Associated Inpatient Outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a T-piece resuscitator compared with a self-inflating bag for providing mask ventilation to newborns at birth. STUDY
designNewborns at ≥26 weeks gestational age receiving positive-pressure ventilation at birth were included in this multicenter cluster-randomized 2-period crossover trial. Positive-pressure ventilation was provided with either a self-inflating bag (self-inflating bag group) with or without a positive end-expiratory pressure valve or a T-piece with a positive end-expiratory pressure valve (T-piece group). Delivery room management followed American Academy of Pediatrics and International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation guidelines. The primary outcome was the proportion of newborns with heart rate (HR)≥100 bpm at 2 minutes after birth.
resultsA total of 1027 newborns were included. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of HR≥100 bpm at 2 minutes after birth between the T-piece and self-inflating bag groups: 94% (479 of 511) and 90% (466 of 516), respectively (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.41-1.05; P=.08). A total of 86 newborns (17%) in the T-piece group and 134 newborns (26%) in the self-inflating bag group were intubated in the delivery room (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8; P=.002). The mean±SD maximum positive inspiratory pressure was 26±2 cm H2O in the T-piece group vs 28±5 cm H2O in the self-inflating bag group (P<.001). Air leaks, use of drugs/chest compressions, mortality, and days on mechanical ventilation did not differ significantly between groups.
conclusionThere was no difference between the T-piece resuscitator and a self-inflating bag in achieving an HR of ≥100 bpm at 2 minutes in newborns≥26 weeks gestational age resuscitated at birth. However, use of the T-piece decreased the intubation rate and the maximum pressures applied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.