Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24689989›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2014

Serosurveillance for Francisella tularensis among wild animals in Japan using a newly developed competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Neekun Sharma, Akitoyo Hotta, Yoshie Yamamoto, Akihiko Uda, Osamu Fujita, Toshio Mizoguchi, Junji Shindo, Chun-Ho Park, Noboru Kudo, Hitoshi Hatai and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  3. Antibodies Related toPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Rapid and Culture Free Identification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  5. Epidemiology and infection · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Neekun Sharma1 Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases , Tokyo, Japan .
Akitoyo Hotta
Yoshie Yamamoto
Akihiko Uda
Osamu Fujita
Toshio Mizoguchi
Junji Shindo
Chun-Ho Park
Noboru Kudo
Hitoshi Hatai
Toshifumi Oyamada
Akio Yamada
Shigeru Morikawa
Kiyoshi Tanabayashi
National Institute of Infectious Diseases · JPKitasato University · JPFukushima Prefectural Culture Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tularemia, a highly infectious zoonotic disease caused by Francisella tularensis, occurs sporadically in Japan. However, little is known about the prevalence of the disease in wild animals. A total of 632 samples obtained from 150 Japanese black bears, 142 Japanese hares, 120 small rodents, 97 rats, 53 raptors, 26 Japanese monkeys, 21 Japanese raccoon dogs, 20 masked palm civets, and three Japanese red foxes between 2002 and 2010 were investigated for the presence of antibodies to F. tularensis by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) and the commonly used microagglutination (MA) test. Seropositive cELISA and MA results were obtained in 23 and 18 Japanese black bears, three and two Japanese raccoon dogs, and two and one small rodents, respectively. All MA-positive samples (n=21) were also positive by cELISA. Six of seven samples that were only positive by cELISA were confirmed to be antibody-positive by western blot analysis. These findings suggest that cELISA is a highly sensitive and useful test for serosurveillance of tularemia among various species of wild animals. Because this is the first study to detect F. tularensis-seropositive Japanese raccoon dogs, these could join Japanese black bears as sentinel animals for tularemia in the wild in Japan. Further continuous serosurveillance for F. tularensis in various species of wild animals using appropriate methods such as cELISA is important to assess the risks of human exposure and to improve our understanding of the ecology of F. tularensis in the wild.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, BacterialEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFoxesFrancisella tularensisHaplorhiniHaresHumansJapanRaccoon DogsRaptorsRatsRodentiaSeroepidemiologic StudiesTularemiaUrsidaeAntibodies, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID24689989
PMCPMC3993067
OpenAlexW1487380168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.