Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24689588›Full record

ArticleThe Review of scientific instruments2014

Synchronous digitization for high dynamic range lock-in amplification in beam-scanning microscopy.

Ryan D Muir, Shane Z Sullivan, Robert A Oglesbee, Garth J Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Review of scientific instruments, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synchronous-digitization for Video Rate Polarization Modulated Beam Scanning Second Harmonic Generation Microscopy.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2015
    Article
  10. Multi-channel beam-scanning imaging at kHz frame rates by Lissajous trajectory microscopy.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ryan D MuirDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Shane Z SullivanDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Robert A OglesbeeDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.
Garth J SimpsonDepartment of Chemistry, Purdue University, 560 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA.

Funding

Nonlinear Optical Imaging for Guiding Protein Structure DeterminationR01GM103401 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI SIMPSON, GARTH JASON · 2012 to 2018
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103401NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM-103401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital lock-in amplification (LIA) with synchronous digitization (SD) is shown to provide significant signal to noise (S/N) and linear dynamic range advantages in beam-scanning microscopy measurements using pulsed laser sources. Direct comparisons between SD-LIA and conventional LIA in homodyne second harmonic generation measurements resulted in S/N enhancements consistent with theoretical models. SD-LIA provided notably larger S/N enhancements in the limit of low light intensities, through the smooth transition between photon counting and signal averaging developed in previous work. Rapid beam scanning instrumentation with up to video rate acquisition speeds minimized photo-induced sample damage. The corresponding increased allowance for higher laser power without sample damage is advantageous for increasing the observed signal content.

Indexed as

LasersImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Video

Identifiers

PMID24689588
PMCPMC3987178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.