Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24689080›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2014

Chromosomal microarray analysis as a first-tier clinical diagnostic test: Estonian experience.

Olga Zilina, Rita Teek, Pille Tammur, Kati Kuuse, Maria Yakoreva, Eve Vaidla, Triin Mölter-Väär, Tiia Reimand, Ants Kurg, Katrin Ounap

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The frontiers of sequencing in undiagnosed neurodevelopmental diseases.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga ZilinaDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Rita TeekDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Pille TammurDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia.
Kati KuuseDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia.
Maria YakorevaDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Biomedicine and Translation Medicine, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Eve VaidlaDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia.
Triin Mölter-VäärDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia.
Tiia ReimandDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Biomedicine, Institute of Biomedicine and Translation Medicine, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Ants KurgDepartment of Biotechnology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Katrin OunapDepartment of Genetics, United Laboratories, Tartu University Hospital Tartu, Estonia ; Department of Pediatrics, University of Tartu Tartu, Estonia.
Tartu University Hospital · EEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is now established as the first-tier cytogenetic diagnostic test for fast and accurate detection of chromosomal abnormalities in patients with developmental delay/intellectual disability (DD/ID), multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), and autism spectrum disorders (ASD). We present our experience with using CMA for postnatal and prenatal diagnosis in Estonian patients during 2009-2012. Since 2011, CMA is on the official service list of the Estonian Health Insurance Fund and is performed as the first-tier cytogenetic test for patients with DD/ID, MCA or ASD. A total of 1191 patients were analyzed, including postnatal (1072 [90%] patients and 59 [5%] family members) and prenatal referrals (60 [5%] fetuses). Abnormal results were reported in 298 (25%) patients, with a total of 351 findings (1-3 per individual): 147 (42%) deletions, 106 (30%) duplications, 89 (25%) long contiguous stretches of homozygosity (LCSH) events (>5 Mb), and nine (3%) aneuploidies. Of all findings, 143 (41%) were defined as pathogenic or likely pathogenic; for another 143 findings (41%), most of which were LCSH, the clinical significance remained unknown, while 61 (18%) reported findings can now be reclassified as benign or likely benign. Clinically relevant findings were detected in 126 (11%) patients. However, the proportion of variants of unknown clinical significance was quite high (41% of all findings). It seems that our ability to detect chromosomal abnormalities has far outpaced our ability to understand their role in disease. Thus, the interpretation of CMA findings remains a rather difficult task requiring a close collaboration between clinicians and cytogeneticists.

Indexed as

Chromosomal microarray analysiscopy-number variationdevelopmental delayfirst-tier testingintellectual disabilitypostnatal diagnosisprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID24689080
PMCPMC3960059
OpenAlexW2049497504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.