Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24689073›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2014

The pathogenicity scoring system for mitochondrial tRNA mutations revisited.

Emiliano González-Vioque, Belén Bornstein, María Esther Gallardo, Miguel Ángel Fernández-Moreno, Rafael Garesse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Mitochondrial encephalopathy Due to a Novel Pathogenic Mitochondrial tRNAAnnals of clinical and translational neurology · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emiliano González-VioqueDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28029, Madrid, Spain ; Laboratorio de Enfermedades Mitocondriales, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid, Spain.
Belén BornsteinDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28029, Madrid, Spain ; Servicio de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Madrid, Spain.
María Esther GallardoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28029, Madrid, Spain ; Laboratorio de Enfermedades Mitocondriales, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid, Spain.
Miguel Ángel Fernández-MorenoDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28029, Madrid, Spain ; Laboratorio de Enfermedades Mitocondriales, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid, Spain.
Rafael GaresseDepartamento de Bioquímica, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols" UAM-CSIC and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid 28029, Madrid, Spain ; Laboratorio de Enfermedades Mitocondriales, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid, Spain.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Confirming the pathogenicity of mitochondrial tRNA point mutations is one of the classical challenges in the field of mitochondrial medicine. In addition to genetic and functional studies, the evaluation of a genetic change using a pathogenicity scoring system is extremely useful to discriminate between disease-causing mutations from neutral polymorphisms. The pathogenicity scoring system is very robust for confirming pathogenicity, especially of mutations that show impaired activity in functional studies. However, mutations giving normal results using the same functional approaches are disregarded, and this compromises the power of the system to rule out pathogenicity. We propose to include a new criterion in the pathogenicity scoring systems regarding mutations which fail to show any mitochondrial defect in functional studies. To evaluate this proposal we characterized two mutations, m.8296A>G and m.8347A>G, in the mitochondrial tRNA(L) (ys) gene (MT-TK) using trans-mitochondrial cybrid analysis. m.8347A>G mutation severely impairs oxidative phosphorylation, suggesting that it is highly pathogenic. By contrast, the behavior of cybrids homoplasmic for the m.8296A>G mutation is similar to cybrids containing wild-type mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The results indicate that including not only positive but also negative outcomes of functional studies in the scoring system is critical for facilitating the diagnosis of this complex group of diseases.

Indexed as

Mitochondrial tRNAMT-TKpathogenicityscoring systemtrans-mitochondrial cybrid study

Identifiers

PMID24689073
PMCPMC3960052
OpenAlexW1983544822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.