Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24689056›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2014

Clinical outcomes after treatment of periodontal intrabony defects with nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (Ostim) or enamel matrix derivatives (Emdogain): a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Elyan Al Machot, Thomas Hoffmann, Katrin Lorenz, Ihssan Khalili, Barbara Noack

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00757159 (Randomised, Clinical Controlled Study on Treatment of Intra-bony Defects With Enamel Matrix Protein), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00757159 phase4completednot on this map

Randomised, Clinical Controlled Study on Treatment of Intra-bony Defects With Enamel Matrix Protein (Emdogain®) vs. Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite (Ostim®)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTechnische Universität DresdenRan2008 to 2012Enrolled56ConditionsPeriodontal Disease, Periodontal Attachment LossArmsOstim, Emdogain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Bone Graft with Empty Defects in Long Bone Fractures: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elyan Al MachotDepartment of Periodontology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1296-6940
Thomas HoffmannDepartment of Periodontology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Katrin LorenzDepartment of Periodontology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Ihssan KhaliliDepartment of Periodontology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1863-6173
Barbara NoackDepartment of Periodontology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0423-7107

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeriodontitis is an inflammatory process in response to dental biofilm and leads to periodontal tissue destruction. The aim of this study was the comparison of outcomes using either an enamel matrix derivative (EMD) or a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (NHA) in regenerative periodontal therapy after 6 and 12 months.

methodsUsing a parallel group, prospective randomized study design, we enrolled 19 patients in each group. The primary outcome was bone fill after 12 months. Attachment gain, probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction, and recession were secondary variables. Additionally, early wound healing and adverse events were assessed. Data analysis included test of noninferiority of NHA group (test) compared to EMD group (reference) in bone fill. Differences in means of secondary variables were compared by paired t-test, frequency data by exact χ(2) test.

resultsBoth groups showed significant bone fill, reduction of PPD, increase in recession, and gain of attachment after 6 and 12 months. No significant differences between groups were found at any time point. Adverse events were comparable between both groups with a tendency of more complaints in the NHA group.

conclusionThe clinical outcomes were similar in both groups. EMD could have some advantage compared to NHA regarding patients comfort and adverse events. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00757159.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDental Enamel ProteinsHumansHydroxyapatitesIntraoperative CareMiddle AgedNanoparticlesPeriodontiumTreatment OutcomeWound HealingDental Enamel Proteinsenamel matrix proteinsHydroxyapatitesOstim-Pastes

Identifiers

PMID24689056
PMCPMC3932837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.