ReviewGlobal cardiology science & practice2013
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The need for randomized trials.
Review in Global cardiology science & practice, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Mavacamten for the Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Novel Cardiac Myosin Inhibitor Therapy for Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in Adults: A Contemporary Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024Review
- Pharmacokinetics of a single dose of Aficamten (CK-274) on cardiac contractility in a A31P MYBPC3 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy cat model.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Article
- Role of quantitative myocardial positron emission tomography for risk stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a 2016 reappraisal.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Article
- Article
- INHERIT (INHibition of the renin angiotensin system in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the Effect on hypertrophy-a Randomised Intervention Trial with losartan).Global cardiology science & practice · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a complex cardiac condition characterized by variable degrees of asymmetric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, generally associated with mutations in sarcomere protein genes. While generally perceived as rare, HCM is the most common genetic heart disease with over one million affected individuals in Europe alone and represents a prevalent cause of sudden cardiac death in the young. To date, HCM remains an orphan disease, as recommended treatment strategies are based on the empirical use of old drugs with little evidence supporting their clinical benefit in this context. In the six decades since the original description of the disease, less than fifty pharmacological studies have been performed in HCM patients, enrolling little over 2,000 HCM patients, mostly comprising small non-randomized cohorts. No specific agent has been convincingly shown to affect outcome, and critical issues such as prevention of myocardial energy depletion, microvascular ischemia, progressive myocardial fibrosis and the peculiar mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis in HCM still need to be addressed in a systematic fashion. However, there is increasing evidence that a variety of drugs may counter the effects of sarcomere protein mutations and the resulting pathophysiological abnormalities at the molecular, cellular and organ level. Following major advances in our understanding of HCM and increasing opportunities for networking among large international referral centres, the opportunity now exists to identify potentially effective treatments and implement adequately designed pharmacological trials, with the ultimate aim to impact the natural course of the disease, alleviate symptoms and improve quality of life in our patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.