Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688963›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion perspectives2013

A Group Intervention for HIV/STI Risk Reduction among Indian Couples.

Ritu Nehra, Rashmi Bagga, Deborah Jones, Deepika Deepika, Sunil Sethi, Sunil Sharma, Stephen M Weiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion perspectives, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ritu NehraDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rashmi BaggaDepartment of Obstetrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Deborah JonesDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Deepika DeepikaDepartment of Obstetrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil SethiDepartment of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sunil SharmaDepartment of Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Stephen M WeissDepartment of Obstetrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHIV in India is transmitted primarily by heterosexual contact. The present study sought to test the feasibility of a group HIV/STI risk re-duction intervention among heterosexual couples in India.

methodsFocus groups and key informant interviews were used in 2008 to cul-turally tailor the intervention. Thirty sexually active and HIV/STI negative cou-ples were enrolled and assessed regarding risk behavior and sexual barrier accept-ability. Gender-concordant group sessions used cognitive behavioral strategies for HIV/STI prevention.

resultsAt baseline, male condom use was low (36%); no participants re-ported use of female condoms or vaginal gels. HIV knowledge was low; women had more HIV knowledge and more positive attitudes towards con-dom use than men. Post-intervention, willingness to use all barrier products (t = 10.0, P< .001) and intentions to avoid risk behavior increased (t = 5.62, P< .001).

conclusionThis study illustrates the feasibility of utilizing a group interven-tion to enhance HIV/STI risk reduction among Indian couples.

Indexed as

HIVIndiaInterventionSexual barrierSTI

Identifiers

PMID24688963
PMCPMC3963661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.