Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688774›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2014

Exploiting sensitization windows of opportunity in hyper and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy.

Anish Prasanna, Mansoor M Ahmed, Mohammed Mohiuddin, C Norman Coleman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emerging evidence for adapting radiotherapy to immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Head and neck tumor cells treated with hypofractionated irradiation die via apoptosis and are better taken up by M1-like macrophages.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Current Review of Spatial Fractionation: Back to the Future?International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anish Prasanna1 Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA ; 2 Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mansoor M Ahmed1 Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA ; 2 Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Mohiuddin1 Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA ; 2 Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
C Norman Coleman1 Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA ; 2 Oncology Centre, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
National Institutes of Health · USAlfaisal University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In contrast to the conventional radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy paradigms used in the treatment of majority of cancer types, this review will describe two areas of radiobiology, hyperfractionated and hypofractionated radiation therapy, for cancer treatment focusing on application of novel concepts underlying these treatment modalities. The initial part of the review discusses the phenomenon of hyper-radiation sensitivity (HRS) at lower doses (0.1 to 0.6 Gy), describing the underlying mechanisms and how this could enhance the effects of chemotherapy, particularly, in hyperfractionated settings. The second part examines the radiobiological/physiological mechanisms underlying the effects of high-dose hypofractionated radiation therapy that can be exploited for tumor cure. These include abscopal/bystander effects, activation of immune system, endothelial cell death and effect of hypoxia with re-oxygenation. These biological properties along with targeted dose delivery and distribution to reduce normal tissue toxicity may make high-dose hypofractionation more effective than conventional radiation therapy for treatment of advanced cancers. The novel radiation physics based methods that take into consideration the tumor volume to be irradiated and normal tissue avoidance/tolerance can further improve treatment outcome and post-treatment quality of life. In conclusion, there is enough evidence to further explore novel avenues to exploit biological mechanisms from hyper-fractionation by enhancing the efficacy of chemotherapy and hypo-fractionated radiation therapy that could enhance tumor control and use imaging and technological advances to reduce toxicity.

Indexed as

chemopotentiationhyperfractionationhyper-radiation sensitivity (HRS)induced radiation resistance (IRR)latticeLow Doses Fractionated Radiation Therapy (LDFRT)spatially fractionated GRID radiotherapy (SFGRT)stereotactic ablative radiosurgery (SARS)stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR)stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)

Identifiers

PMID24688774
PMCPMC3968552
OpenAlexW1954205492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.