ReviewTherapeutic advances in hematology2014
The evolution of clonality testing in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematological malignancies.
Review in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of two NGS-based assays for somatic hypermutation analysis of IGHV genes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.Blood research · 2026Article
- Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis-a review of current knowledge and future directions.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Review
- Deciphering Tumor Cell Evolution in Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: Distinct Differentiation Trajectories in Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2024Article
- Conventional PCR-based versus next-generation sequencing-based approach for T-cell receptor γ gene clonality assessment in mature T-cell lymphomas: A phase 3 diagnostic accuracy study.Journal of biological methods · 2024Article
- Article
- LymphoTrack Is Equally Sensitive as PCR GeneScan and Sanger Sequencing for Detection of Clonal Rearrangements in ALL Patients.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Experience with the BIOMED-2 standardized polymerase chain reaction protocol for immunoglobulin and T- cell receptor clonality analysis in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, ColombiaBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022Article
- Enhancing diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma using non-recombined T-cell receptor sequences.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing-Based Clonality Detection of Immunoglobulin Gene Rearrangements in B-Cell Lymphoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Article
- The Importance of Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing Usage in Cytogenetically Normal Myeloid Malignancies.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the clinicopathologic features of diffuse large B cell lymphoma after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy emphasizing the potential diagnostic pitfalls.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Novel markers in pediatric-type follicular lymphoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019Article
- Article
- The Role of New Technologies in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
- RNA sequencing identifies clonal structure of T-cell repertoires in patients with adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.NPJ genomic medicine · 2019Article
- Resolving the diagnostic dilemma of T-cell clonal expansion after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in T-cell lymphoma patients by TCR-gamma next generation sequencing.Bone marrow transplantation · 2019Article
- T cell clonality assessment: past, present and future.Journal of clinical pathology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, distinguishing between benign and malignant lymphoid proliferations is based on a combination of clinical characteristics, cyto/histomorphology, immunophenotype and the identification of well-defined chromosomal aberrations. However, such diagnoses remain challenging in 10-15% of cases of lymphoproliferative disorders, and clonality assessments are often required to confirm diagnostic suspicions. In recent years, the development of new techniques for clonality detection has allowed researchers to better characterize, classify and monitor hematological neoplasms. In the past, clonality was primarily studied by performing Southern blotting analyses to characterize rearrangements in segments of the IG and TCR genes. Currently, the most commonly used method in the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is an extremely sensitive technique for detecting nucleic acids. This technique is rapid, accurate, specific, and sensitive, and it can be used to analyze small biopsies as well as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. These advantages make PCR-based approaches the current gold standard for IG/TCR clonality testing. Since the completion of the first human genome sequence, there has been a rapid development of technologies to facilitate high-throughput sequencing of DNA. These techniques have been applied to the deep characterization and classification of various diseases, patient stratification, and the monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, these novel approaches have the potential to significantly improve the sensitivity and cost of clonality assays and post-treatment monitoring of B- and T-cell malignancies. However, more studies will be required to demonstrate the utility, sensitivity, and benefits of these methods in order to warrant their adoption into clinical practice. In this review, recent developments in clonality testing are examined with an emphasis on highly sensitive systems for improving diagnostic workups and minimal residual disease assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.