Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688753›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in hematology2014

The evolution of clonality testing in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematological malignancies.

Anna Gazzola, Claudia Mannu, Maura Rossi, Maria Antonella Laginestra, Maria Rosaria Sapienza, Fabio Fuligni, Maryam Etebari, Federica Melle, Elena Sabattini, Claudio Agostinelli and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel markers in pediatric-type follicular lymphoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. T cell clonality assessment: past, present and future.Journal of clinical pathology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Anna GazzolaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Claudia MannuDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Maura RossiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Antonella LaginestraDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Rosaria SapienzaDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Fabio FuligniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Maryam EtebariDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Federica MelleDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Elena SabattiniDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Claudio AgostinelliDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco BacciDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo Alberto Sagramoso SacchettiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Stefano Aldo PileriDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Pier Paolo PiccalugaMolecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine, Bologna University Medical School, Unit of Hematopathology, S. Orsola Malpighi Hospital, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, distinguishing between benign and malignant lymphoid proliferations is based on a combination of clinical characteristics, cyto/histomorphology, immunophenotype and the identification of well-defined chromosomal aberrations. However, such diagnoses remain challenging in 10-15% of cases of lymphoproliferative disorders, and clonality assessments are often required to confirm diagnostic suspicions. In recent years, the development of new techniques for clonality detection has allowed researchers to better characterize, classify and monitor hematological neoplasms. In the past, clonality was primarily studied by performing Southern blotting analyses to characterize rearrangements in segments of the IG and TCR genes. Currently, the most commonly used method in the clinical molecular diagnostic laboratory is polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which is an extremely sensitive technique for detecting nucleic acids. This technique is rapid, accurate, specific, and sensitive, and it can be used to analyze small biopsies as well as formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. These advantages make PCR-based approaches the current gold standard for IG/TCR clonality testing. Since the completion of the first human genome sequence, there has been a rapid development of technologies to facilitate high-throughput sequencing of DNA. These techniques have been applied to the deep characterization and classification of various diseases, patient stratification, and the monitoring of minimal residual disease. Furthermore, these novel approaches have the potential to significantly improve the sensitivity and cost of clonality assays and post-treatment monitoring of B- and T-cell malignancies. However, more studies will be required to demonstrate the utility, sensitivity, and benefits of these methods in order to warrant their adoption into clinical practice. In this review, recent developments in clonality testing are examined with an emphasis on highly sensitive systems for improving diagnostic workups and minimal residual disease assessments.

Indexed as

clonalityhematological neoplasmshigh-throughput sequencingPCR

Identifiers

PMID24688753
PMCPMC3949299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.