Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688736›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2013

Biochemical and biophysical characterization of recombinant yeast proteasome maturation factor ump1.

Bebiana Sá-Moura, Ana Marisa Simões, Joana Fraga, Humberto Fernandes, Isabel A Abreu, Hugo M Botelho, Cláudio M Gomes, António J Marques, R Jürgen Dohmen, Paula C Ramos and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Nuclear Transport of Yeast Proteasomes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Proteasome Structure and Assembly.Journal of molecular biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Proteasome assembly.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Bebiana Sá-MouraIBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Ana Marisa SimõesIBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Joana FragaIBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Humberto FernandesCentre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, CBME/IBB, LA, Portugal ; Current address: Biophysics Section, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College, London, UK.
Isabel A AbreuIBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal ; Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
Hugo M BotelhoInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal ; Current address: BioFIG - Centre for Biodiversity, Functional and Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisboa, Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal.
Cláudio M GomesInstituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.
António J MarquesCentre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, CBME/IBB, LA, Portugal ; Current address: Immunodiagnostic Systems, Core Technology, 10 Didcot Way, Boldon, NE35 9PD, UK.
R Jürgen DohmenInstitute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47, D-50674 Cologne, Germany.
Paula C RamosCentre for Molecular and Structural Biomedicine, CBME/IBB, LA, Portugal ; Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Str. 47, D-50674 Cologne, Germany.
Sandra Macedo-RibeiroIBMC - Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Cologne · DEImmunodiagnostic Systems (Denmark) · DKInstitute for Biotechnology and Bioengineering · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein degradation is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis. The proteasome is the central enzyme responsible for non-lysosomal protein degradation in eukaryotic cells. Although proteasome assembly is not yet completely understood, a number of cofactors required for proper assembly and maturation have been identified. Ump is a short-lived maturation factor required for the efficient biogenesis of the 20S proteasome. Upon the association of the two precursor complexes, Ump is encased and is rapidly degraded after the proteolytic sites in the interior of the nascent proteasome are activated. In order to further understand the mechanisms behind proteasomal maturation, we expressed and purified yeast Ump in E. coli for biophysical and structural analysis. We show that recombinant Ump is purified as a mixture of different oligomeric species and that oligomerization is mediated by intermolecular disulfide bond formation involving the only cysteine residue present in the protein. Furthermore, a combination of bioinformatic, biochemical and structural analysis revealed that Ump shows characteristics of an intrinsically disordered protein, which might become structured only upon interaction with the proteasome subunits.

Indexed as

Circular dichroismdynamic light scatteringintrinsically disorderedprotein structure

Identifiers

PMID24688736
PMCPMC3962104
OpenAlexW2152384682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.