Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688677›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2012

Microbial Consortia Engineering for Cellular Factories: in vitro to in silico systems.

Hans C Bernstein, Ross P Carlson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A new era of synthetic biology-microbial community design.Synthetic biology (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Metabolic modelling approaches for describing and engineering microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hans C BernsteinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering & Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States.
Ross P CarlsonDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering & Center for Biofilm Engineering, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, United States.

Funding

Novel Chemical Analyses of the Biofilm-Biomaterial InterfaceR01EB006532 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HANLEY, LUKE · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006532
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This mini-review discusses the current state of experimental and computational microbial consortia engineering with a focus on cellular factories. A discussion of promising ecological theories central to community resource usage is presented to facilitate interpretation of consortial designs. Recent case studies exemplifying different resource usage motifs and consortial assembly templates are presented. The review also highlights in silico approaches to design and to analyze consortia with an emphasis on stoichiometric modeling methods. The discipline of microbial consortia engineering possesses a widely accepted potential to generate highly novel and effective bio-catalysts for applications from biofuels to specialty chemicals to enhanced mineral recovery.

Identifiers

PMID24688677
PMCPMC3962199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.