Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688666›Full record

ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2012

Developing a yeast cell factory for the production of terpenoids.

Sotirios C Kampranis, Antonios M Makris

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Systematic mining of fungal chimeric terpene synthases using an efficient precursor-providing yeast chassis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Model SystemLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  12. EngineeringFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Cellular factories for coenzyme QMicrobial cell factories · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sotirios C KampranisSchool of Medicine, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, Heraklion 71003, Greece.
Antonios M MakrisInstitute of Applied Biosciences/ CERTH, P.O. Box 60361, Thermi 57001, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Centre for Research and Technology Hellas · GRUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological developments over the past century have made microbes the work-horses of large scale industrial production processes. Current efforts focus on the metabolic engineering of microbial strains to produce high levels of desirable end-products. The arsenal of the contemporary metabolic engineer contains tools that allow either targeted rational interventions or global screens that combine classical approaches with -omics technologies. Production of terpenoids in S. cerevisiae presents a characteristic example of contemporary biotechnology that integrates all the variety of novel approaches used in metabolic engineering. Terpenoids have attracted significant interest as pharmaceuticals, flavour and fragrance additives, and, more recently, biofuels. The ongoing metabolic engineering efforts, combined with the continuously increasing number of terpene biosynthetic enzymes discovered will enable the economical and environmentally friendly production of a wide range of compounds.

Identifiers

PMID24688666
PMCPMC3962098
OpenAlexW2082995554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.