ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2012
Cellulose degradation by oxidative enzymes.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming Cellulose for Sustainability: Comprehensive Insights into Modification Approaches and Their Applications.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Creating a large designer cellulosome in yeast to boost ethanol production.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The Disputable Costs of Sleeping.Biology · 2025Review
- Expanding the catalytic landscape of metalloenzymes with lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases.Nature reviews. Chemistry · 2024Review
- Enzymatic degradation of cellulose in soil: A review.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Enzymatic machinery of wood-inhabiting fungi that degrade temperate tree species.The ISME journal · 2024Article
- Lignocellulolytic Biocatalysts: The Main Players Involved in Multiple Biotechnological Processes for Biomass Valorization.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Evaluating polymeric biomaterials to improve next generation wound dressing design.Biomaterials research · 2022Review
- Genetically related genotypes of cowpea present similar bacterial community in the rhizosphere.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Endophytes in Lignin Valorization: A Novel Approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- The Cultivation Method Affects the Transcriptomic Response of Aspergillus niger to Growth on Sugar Beet Pulp.Microbiology spectrum · 2021Article
- Cost-effective production of biocatalysts using inexpensive plant biomass: a review.3 Biotech · 2021Review
- Consolidated Bioprocessing: Synthetic Biology Routes to Fuels and Fine Chemicals.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Role of extremophiles and their extremozymes in biorefinery process of lignocellulose degradation.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2021Review
- Production of Nanocellulose by Enzymatic Treatment for Application in Polymer Composites.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Vibrational Spectroscopic Analyses and Imaging of the Early Middle Ages Hemp Bast Fibres Recovered from Lake Sediments.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A microalgal-based preparation with synergistic cellulolytic and detoxifying action towards chemical-treated lignocellulose.Plant biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- LPMOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Ligninolytic enzymes and its mechanisms for degradation of lignocellulosic waste in environment.Heliyon · 2020Review
- Industrial Use of Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes: The Fine Line Between Production Strategy and Economic Feasibility.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enzymatic degradation of plant biomass has attracted intensive research interest for the production of economically viable biofuels. Here we present an overview of the recent findings on biocatalysts implicated in the oxidative cleavage of cellulose, including polysaccharide monooxygenases (PMOs or LPMOs which stands for lytic PMOs), cellobiose dehydrogenases (CDHs) and members of carbohydrate-binding module family 33 (CBM33). PMOs, a novel class of enzymes previously termed GH61s, boost the efficiency of common cellulases resulting in increased hydrolysis yields while lowering the protein loading needed. They act on the crystalline part of cellulose by generating oxidized and non-oxidized chain ends. An external electron donor is required for boosting the activity of PMOs. We discuss recent findings concerning their mechanism of action and identify issues and questions to be addressed in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.