ReviewComputational and structural biotechnology journal2012
Genetic code redundancy and its influence on the encoded polypeptides.
Review in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- A rotavirus vaccine candidate attenuated by codon deoptimization protects neonatal mice against wild-type virus infection.PLoS pathogens · 2026Article
- Native CFTR codon bias controls translation rate to balance off-pathway aggregation and channel function by conformational imprinting.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Non-Viral RNA Therapies for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Their Corresponding Clinical Trials.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Extensive breaking of genetic code degeneracy with non-canonical amino acids.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Importance of the 5' regulatory region to bacterial synthetic biology applications.Microbial biotechnology · 2021Review
- Are Nonsynonymous Transversions Generally More Deleterious than Nonsynonymous Transitions?Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Embodied Computational Evolution: Feedback Between Development and Evolution in Simulated Biorobots.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Unraveling the Role of Silent Mutation in the ω-Subunit ofACS omega · 2019Article
- Review
- Mitochondrial introgression and interspecies recombination in theIMA fungus · 2018Article
- Mitochondrial variation in subpopulations of Anopheles balabacensis Baisas in Sabah, Malaysia (Diptera: Culicidae).PloS one · 2018Article
- Significant differences in terms of codon usage bias between bacteriophage early and late genes: a comparative genomics analysis.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Bicodon bias can determine the role of synonymous SNPs in human diseases.BMC genomics · 2017Article
- Does mRNA structure contain genetic information for regulating co-translational protein folding?Zoological research · 2017Review
- Article
- Novel Rhizosphere Soil Alleles for the Enzyme 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylate Deaminase Queried for Function with an In Vivo Competition Assay.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Codon Usage Influences the Local Rate of Translation Elongation to Regulate Co-translational Protein Folding.Molecular cell · 2015Article
- Review
- How Co-translational Folding of Multi-domain Protein Is Affected by Elongation Schedule: Molecular Simulations.PLoS computational biology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The genetic code is said to be redundant in that the same amino acid residue can be encoded by multiple, so-called synonymous, codons. If all properties of synonymous codons were entirely equivalent, one would expect that they would be equally distributed along protein coding sequences. However, many studies over the last three decades have demonstrated that their distribution is not entirely random. It has been postulated that certain codons may be translated by the ribosome faster than others and thus their non-random distribution dictates how fast the ribosome moves along particular segments of the mRNA. The reasons behind such segmental variability in the rates of protein synthesis, and thus polypeptide emergence from the ribosome, have been explored by theoretical and experimental approaches. Predictions of the relative rates at which particular codons are translated and their impact on the nascent chain have not arrived at unequivocal conclusions. This is probably due, at least in part, to variation in the basis for classification of codons as "fast" or "slow", as well as variability in the number and types of genes and proteins analyzed. Recent methodological advances have allowed nucleotide-resolution studies of ribosome residency times in entire transcriptomes, which confirm the non-uniform movement of ribosomes along mRNAs and shed light on the actual determinants of rate control. Moreover, experiments have begun to emerge that systematically examine the influence of variations in ribosomal movement and the fate of the emerging polypeptide chain.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.