Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24688603›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in urology2014

The Prostate Health Index: a new test for the detection of prostate cancer.

Stacy Loeb, William J Catalona

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in urology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prostate Cancer: Etiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.Serican journal of medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Biomarkers in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prostate cancer theragnostics biomarkers: An update.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  18. Review
  19. [Prostate cancer screening-current overview].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  20. Article

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stacy LoebDepartment of Urology and Population Health, New York University and the Manhattan Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
William J CatalonaDepartment of Urology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Funding

Optimal Strategy for Conservative Management of Prostate CancerK07CA178258 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LOEB, STACY · 2013 to 2017
$889k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA178258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major focus in urologic research is the identification of new biomarkers with improved specificity for clinically-significant prostate cancer. A promising new test based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is called the Prostate Health Index (PHI), which has recently been approved in the United States, Europe and Australia. PHI is a mathematical formula that combines total PSA, free PSA and [-2] proPSA. Numerous international studies have consistently shown that PHI outperforms its individual components for the prediction of overall and high-grade prostate cancer on biopsy. PHI also predicts the likelihood of progression during active surveillance, providing another noninvasive modality to potentially select and monitor this patient population. This article reviews the evidence on this new blood test with significant promise for both prostate cancer screening and treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

free PSAPHIprognosisprostate cancerprostate health indexPSAscreening

Identifiers

PMID24688603
PMCPMC3943368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.