ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2014
Molecular response of the axillary lymph node microenvironment to metastatic colonization.
Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
- Real-time ex vivo perfusion of human lymph nodes invaded by cancer (REPLICANT): a feasibility study.The Journal of pathology · 2020Article
- Article
- Molecular patterns of cancer colonisation in lymph nodes of breast cancer patients.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2018Review
- Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer - What Can We Learn from Translational Research?Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Breast Cancer Metastasis to the Axillary Lymph Nodes: Are Changes to the Lymph Node "Soil" Localized or Systemic?Breast cancer : basic and clinical research · 2017Article
- Molecular signatures of lymph node status by intrinsic subtype: gene expression analysis of primary breast tumors from patients with and without metastatic lymph nodes.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast stroma plays an active role in tumorigenesis, undergoing both phenotypic and molecular changes that facilitate and promote tumor development and growth. The metastatic microenvironment also plays a role in successful colonization; however, genetic changes in these secondary microenvironments are not well described. To improve understanding of molecular changes associated with metastatic colonization, gene expression patterns from lymph node tissues from women with at least one positive, as well as one negative node, were compared. Lymph node tissue was microdissected and hybridized to U133A 2.0 gene expression arrays. Differential expression was detected using Partek(®) Genomics Suite™ 6.6 with FDR <0.05 and >2-fold change defining significance. Twenty-two genes were differentially expressed, 14 genes, including AZGP1, FOXA1 and PIP, were expressed at significantly higher levels in colonized lymph nodes and eight genes, such as CXCL2 and HPGDS, were expressed at significantly higher levels in non-metastatic lymph nodes. Thus, lymph node tissues harboring metastases have different gene expression patterns from those without metastases. Many differentially expressed genes are involved in cellular proliferation and survival, immune function and mesenchymal-epithelial transition, suggesting that repression of immune response and restoration of an epithelial phenotype in the host tissue are critical for successful establishment of lymph node metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.