Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24687563›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2014

Stability of spinal bone metastases in breast cancer after radiotherapy: a retrospective analysis of 157 cases.

Ingmar Schlampp, Stefan Rieken, Daniel Habermehl, Thomas Bruckner, Robert Förster, Jürgen Debus, Harald Rief

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy and safety of CT-guidedFrontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The spine instability neoplastic score (SINS) in the assessment of response to radiotherapy for bone metastases.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. CT-GuidedBioMed research international · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effective local control of vertebral metastases by simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy: preliminary results.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ingmar SchlamppDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany, ingmar.schlampp@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Stefan Rieken
Daniel Habermehl
Thomas Bruckner
Robert Förster
Jürgen Debus
Harald Rief
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate osteolytic bone lesions of breast cancer in the thoracic and lumbar spine after radiotherapy (RT) in terms of stability using a validated scoring system.

methodsThe stability of 157 osteolytic metastases, treated from January 2000 to January 2012, in 115 patients with breast cancer was evaluated retrospectively using the Taneichi score. Predictive factors for stability were analyzed and survival rates were calculated.

resultsEighty-five (54%) lesions were classified as unstable prior to RT. After 3 and 6 months, 109 (70%) and 124 (79%) lesions, respectively, were classified as stable. Thirty fractures were detected prior to RT, and after RT seven cases (4.5%) with pathologic fractures were found within 6 months. None of the examined predictive factors showed significant correlation with stability 6 months after RT. After a median follow-up of 16.7 months, Kaplan-Meier estimates revealed an overall survival of 83% after 5 years.

conclusionThe majority of patients showed an improved or unchanged stability of the involved vertebral bodies after 6 months. The patients showed only minor cancer-related morbidity during follow-up and reached comparably high survival rates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFractures, SpontaneousHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKarnofsky Performance StatusLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedOsteolysisOsteoradionecrosis

Identifiers

PMID24687563
PMCPMC4141967
OpenAlexW2261937356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.