Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24687386›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014

TBS result is not affected by lumbar spine osteoarthritis.

S Kolta, K Briot, J Fechtenbaum, S Paternotte, G Armbrecht, D Felsenberg, C C Glüer, R Eastell, C Roux

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 116 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Automated abdominal aortic calcification and trabecular bone score independently predict incident fracture during routine osteoporosis screening.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Proton pump inhibitor exposure, trabecular bone score, and BMD: a registry-based cohort study.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comment on: Bone density and fracture risk factors in ankylosing spondylitis: a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on trabecular bone score.Archives of endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Review
  15. Effect of degeneration on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score and CT Hounsfield unit measurements in a spine surgery patient population.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  16. Trabecular Bone Score in Rheumatic Disease.Current rheumatology reports · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Effect of compression fracture on trabecular bone score at lumbar spine.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

S KoltaINSERM, U 1153, Rheumatology Department, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France, sami.kolta@cch.aphp.fr.
K Briot
J Fechtenbaum
S Paternotte
G Armbrecht
D Felsenberg
C C Glüer
R Eastell
C Roux
Hôpital Cochin · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEDélégation Paris 5 · FRHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006312/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe effect of lumbar osteoarthritis on bone density and trabecular bone score (TBS) was evaluated cross-sectionally and prospectively in postmenopausal women. Lumbar spine osteoarthritis was graded according to Kellgren and Lawrence grades. Lumbar osteoarthritis was found to increase lumbar spine bone density, but not TBS.

introductionLumbar osteoarthritis overestimates lumbar bone density (areal bone mineral density (aBMD)). A new texture parameter, the TBS, has been proposed. Calculation of aBMD uses grey level value, while TBS uses grey level variation. Therefore, our hypothesis was that TBS is not influenced by lumbar spine osteoarthritis.

methodsMenopausal women participating in osteoporosis and ultrasound (OPUS) study were included. They had an aBMD measurement of the spine and hip at baseline and 6-year visit. TBS was calculated on lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans in an automated manner. The presence of lumbar osteoarthritis was evaluated on baseline radiographs using Kellgren and Lawrence (K&L) classification. Grades range from 0 to 4. In our study, osteoarthritis was defined by at least K&L grade 2.

resultsThis study included 1,254 menopausal women (66.7 ± 7.1 years). Among them, 727 attended the 6-year follow-up visit. Patients with lumbar osteoarthritis had an aBMD higher than those without lumbar osteoarthritis at the lumbar spine, but not at the hip. However, the aBMD significantly increased in all sites with the grade of K&L. In contrast, spine TBS was not different between patients with and without lumbar osteoarthritis (p = 0.70), and it was not correlated with K&L grade. Spine TBS and aBMD at all sites were negatively correlated with age (p < 0.0001). Body mass index was correlated positively with aBMD and negatively with spine TBS (p < 0.0001). The 6-year change of aBMD was significant in the hip and nonsignificant in the lumbar spine. That of TBS was significant, with a 3.3 % decrease (p < 0.0001), independent of K&L grade (p = 0.28).

conclusionIn postmenopausal women, lumbar osteoarthritis leads to an increase in lumbar spine aBMD. In contrast, spine TBS is not affected by lumbar osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAdultAgedBody Mass IndexBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFemur NeckHip JointHumansLongitudinal StudiesLumbar VertebraeMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, SpinePostmenopauseSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID24687386
OpenAlexW1978484046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.