Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24687306›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue research2014

Cell turnover in the repopulated rat liver: distinct lineages for hepatocytes and the biliary epithelium.

Fabio Marongiu, Maria Paola Serra, Marcella Sini, Michela Marongiu, Antonella Contini, Ezio Laconi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Minireview: prolactin regulation of adult stem cells.Molecular endocrinology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fabio MarongiuDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Unit of Experimental Medicine, University of Cagliari School of Medicine, Via Porcell 4, 3rd Floor, Cagliari, 09124, Italy.
Maria Paola Serra
Marcella Sini
Michela Marongiu
Antonella Contini
Ezio Laconi
University of Cagliari · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of cell renewal in the normal adult liver remains an unresolved issue. We investigate the possible contribution of a common biliary precursor cell pool to hepatocyte turnover in the chimeric long-term repopulated rat liver. The retrorsine (RS)-based model of massive liver repopulation was used. Animals not expressing the CD26 marker (CD26(-)) were injected with RS, followed by transplantation of 2 million syngeneic hepatocytes isolated from a normal CD26-expressing donor. Extensive (80-90%) replacement of resident parenchymal cells was observed at 1 year post-transplantation and persisted at 2 years, as expected. A panel of specific markers, including cytokeratin 7, OV6, EpCAM, claudin 7 and α-fetoprotein, was employed to locate the in situ putative progenitor and/or biliary epithelial cells in the stably repopulated liver. No overlap was observed between any of these markers and the CD26 tag identifying transplanted cells. Exposure to RS was not inhibitory to the putative progenitor and/or biliary epithelial cells, nor did we observe any evidence of cell fusion between these cells and the transplanted cell population. Given the long-term (>2 years) stability of the donor cell phenotype in this model of liver repopulation, the present findings suggest that hepatocyte turnover in the repopulated liver is fuelled by a cell lineage distinct from that of the biliary epithelium and relies largely on the differentiated parenchymal cell population. These results support the solid biological foundation of liver repopulation strategies based on the transplantation of isolated hepatocytes.

Indexed as

alpha-FetoproteinsAnimalsAntigens, DifferentiationAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBile DuctsCell Adhesion MoleculesCell LineageClaudinsDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Epithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial CellsEpitheliumHepatocytesKeratin-7Liveralpha-FetoproteinsAntigens, DifferentiationAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCell Adhesion MoleculesClaudinsCldn7 protein, mouseDipeptidyl Peptidase 4Epithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeKeratin-7oval cell marker OV-6Pyrrolizidine Alkaloidsretrorsine

Identifiers

PMID24687306
PMCPMC4015059
OpenAlexW1999179768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.